Introduction
Cicatricial pemphigoid represents a rare, chronic autoimmune blistering disorder characterized by the potential to cause scarring. The disease may affect the skin alone, the mucous membranes alone, or both. When confined to the mucous membranes, the condition is often termed mucous membrane pemphigoid.[1] In cases limited to the ocular surfaces, the term ocular pemphigoid is commonly used.[2]
The likelihood of scarring depends largely on the anatomical site of disease involvement. Diagnosing cicatricial pemphigoid can present significant challenges, particularly in the early stages, when clinical features may be nonspecific. Given the potential for serious complications, eg, vision loss and airway obstruction, early recognition and prompt initiation of aggressive therapy may help prevent irreversible damage and improve long-term outcomes.
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
Autoantibodies targeted to components of the basement membrane zone have been identified as pathogenic in cicatricial pemphigoid. Patients with cicatricial pemphigoid may have antibodies detected to 180-kD bullous pemphigoid antigen (BP180), laminin 332 (previously known as epiligrin or laminin-5), beta-4-integrin, and other antigens that have not been fully described.[3][4][5]
Epidemiology
Cicatricial pemphigoid remains a rare autoimmune disorder, with precise prevalence and incidence rates yet to be fully established. Estimates from epidemiological studies vary by region. A study conducted in France reported an incidence of 1.16 cases per million individuals annually, while data from Germany indicated a slightly lower incidence of 0.87 cases per million per year.[6][7] Demographic patterns suggest a tendency toward later onset and female predominance. In a Greek study, the mean age of onset was 66 years, with a female-to-male ratio of 1.5:1.[8] A German population study reported a more pronounced gender disparity, with a female-to-male ratio reaching 7:1.[7]
Ocular involvement appears commonly among patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid. In a retrospective review of 162 patients, 67% presented with ocular disease. Among those without ocular involvement at baseline, the risk of developing ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid was estimated at 0.014 per person-year.[9]
Genetic predisposition may contribute to disease susceptibility. The HLA-DQB1*0301 allele has been identified as a genetic marker associated with increased risk for developing cicatricial pemphigoid.[10]
Pathophysiology
Cicatricial pemphigoid is an antibody-mediated blistering disorder. The antibodies target molecules responsible for adhesion within the basement membrane zone of the mucosa and skin. This disrupts the normal structure and function of the basement membrane, allowing the epidermis to separate from the dermis. Clinically, this manifests as blisters and erosions. Several target molecules are associated with the pathogenesis of cicatricial pemphigoid.
Laminin 332 is a transmembrane protein that connects the alpha-6-beta-4 integrin of the hemidesmosome of the keratinocyte to the noncollagenous 1 (NC1) domain of collagen VII. Collagen VII is the attachment for the anchoring fibrils that secure the basement membrane to the dermis. Laminin 332 assists in strengthening the attachment of the epidermis to the dermis against shearing forces.
BP180, also known as collagen XVII, functions as a transmembrane collagen and serves as a structural component of the hemidesmosome in epithelial cells. Within the hemidesmosome, the dense plaque binds keratin 5 and keratin 14 inside the keratinocyte, anchoring the cytoskeleton to the basement membrane. BP180 spans the lamina lucida, with its noncollagenous N-terminal domain positioned near the cellular membrane and its collagenous C-terminal domain extending through the lamina lucida into the lamina densa.
Autoantibodies in bullous pemphigoid predominantly target the N-terminal region of BP180, whereas autoantibodies in cicatricial pemphigoid primarily target the C-terminal region. This difference in antigenic specificity likely contributes to the distinct clinical manifestations observed in each disease. In bullous pemphigoid, targeting the N-terminus results in a more superficial blistering process that rarely leads to scarring.[11][12] In contrast, the deeper disruption caused by targeting the C-terminus in cicatricial pemphigoid often results in more severe tissue damage and scarring. These pathophysiological distinctions underscore the importance of antibody profiling in differentiating between these autoimmune blistering disorders.[13]
Alpha-6-beta-4 integrin forms a critical component of the hemidesmosome, where it binds transmembrane laminin 332, which in turn anchors to collagen VII. This integrin plays a central role in maintaining epithelial adhesion and structural integrity. Research has shown that sera and IgG fractions from patients with cicatricial pemphigoid frequently target the intracellular domain of alpha-6-beta-4 integrin, suggesting a potential pathogenic role for this autoantigen in disease development.[14][15][14]
Additional evidence supports the involvement of beta-4 integrin in mucous membrane pemphigoid. A recent study revealed that sera from patients with ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid demonstrated reactivity to the beta-4 integrin subunit.[14][15] These findings underscore the significance of integrin-targeting autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of cicatricial pemphigoid, particularly in ocular variants, and may help explain the tissue-specific manifestations observed in affected individuals.
Histopathology
The histopathologic appearance of cicatricial pemphigoid is characterized by a subepidermal blister with a dermal lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, accompanied by variable numbers of neutrophils and eosinophils. However, this finding is nonspecific and can also be seen in other immunobullous disorders, including bullous pemphigoid, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita.[13] Plasma cell infiltrate is more common in mucosal biopsies.[16] Fibrosis may be present in older lesions.[13]
History and Physical
The mouth represents the most frequently affected site in cicatricial pemphigoid and, in some cases, remains the only site involved. Any area within the oral cavity may become affected, including the buccal mucosa, gingiva, tongue, vermillion lips, and palate.[8] In some patients, the disease extends into the posterior pharynx. Clinically, oral involvement may manifest as desquamative gingivitis, blisters, erosions, or ulcers. Individuals with desquamative gingivitis often report pain or bleeding while brushing their teeth. Persistent inflammation and difficulty maintaining proper oral hygiene contribute to the development of dental caries, tooth loss, and resorption of alveolar bone.[17] Although scarring within the oral cavity occurs infrequently, some patients may develop white reticulated patches or mucosal adhesions.[17]
Ocular involvement in cicatricial pemphigoid typically follows a progressive course, with scar formation capable of leading to blindness.[18] The inflammation typically advances slowly, and patients may initially present with nonspecific symptoms, eg, ocular burning, irritation, or excessive tearing.[19][16] The disease often begins unilaterally but usually involves both eyes over time.[20] Frank blisters rarely appear in the ocular region. Early signs of scarring are commonly observed in the inferior fornices. Symblepharon, or fibrous adhesions between the lid and globe conjunctiva, may be identified by pulling down the lower eyelid and directing the patient to look upward.[20] As the disease progresses, total scarring of the conjunctival sac may occur, resulting in ankyloblepharon and an inability to close the eyelids completely.[20] Chronic conjunctival inflammation also damages the lacrimal glands and goblet cells, leading to reduced tear and mucin production.[20] Scarring of the eyelids causes entropion and trichiasis, which exacerbate corneal trauma and contribute to corneal epithelial keratinization, ultimately resulting in diminished visual acuity.[20][21]
Nasopharyngeal involvement, while less common, can present with crusted nasal lesions, epistaxis, or chronic sinusitis.[22] In some cases, mucosal adhesions form between internal structures, creating partial airway obstruction and, in rare instances, contributing to sleep apnea. Laryngeal involvement may manifest as hoarseness or a persistent sore throat.[22] When fibrosis affects the vocal cords, permanent loss of phonation can occur. In patients with advanced disease and significant airway compromise, tracheostomy has been required as a life-saving measure.[22]
Esophageal disease may lead to symptoms such as odynophagia, dysphagia, chest pain, and, in some cases, esophageal stenosis.[22] Genital and perianal involvement remains rare but can be particularly distressing. Erosions and ulcerations in the genital area produce significant discomfort, and mucosal scarring may narrow the urethra or vaginal opening, sometimes necessitating surgical correction to restore function.[23] Anal involvement most often presents with pain and muscular spasm.[23]
Cutaneous manifestations of cicatricial pemphigoid occur in 2 distinct patterns. One subtype presents as widespread, tense bullae that heal without scarring. The other form involves blisters on an erythematous base that tend to localize and result in atrophic scars, most often on the head and neck. Lesions on the scalp frequently lead to alopecia.[24] Brunsting-Perry pemphigoid, once classified as a subset of cicatricial pemphigoid, produces scarring bullous eruptions on the head and neck skin without mucosal involvement. This presentation is now recognized as a clinical phenotype of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita.
Evaluation
A biopsy of lesional skin remains essential for histopathological evaluation, offering critical insight into the diagnosis and helping to distinguish cicatricial pemphigoid from other blistering disorders. (Please refer to the Histopathology section for more information on findings.)
In addition to the lesional biopsy, sampling of perilesional skin for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is recommended. DIF typically reveals a linear band of IgG and C3 at the basement membrane zone, which serves as a hallmark of the disease.[25] Occasionally, linear deposition of IgA may also appear along the basement membrane zone.[26] To enhance diagnostic sensitivity, multiple and repeated biopsies from different perilesional sites may be warranted.[27]
Although indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) is also recommended, positive results occur in only a small subset of patients, with antibody titers generally remaining low.[25] IIF performed on salt-split skin may reveal either an epidermal or dermal staining pattern, reflecting the targeted antigen. Detection of circulating IgG or IgA autoantibodies through IIF can assist in diagnosis, particularly when a concentrated assay is employed alongside the salt-split technique.[13] This approach improves diagnostic utility by allowing simultaneous evaluation for both IgG and IgA reactivity.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing may further aid in diagnosis, particularly when used to identify autoantibodies directed against the C-terminal domain of BP180 or laminin 332. Although highly informative, these ELISA tests may not be accessible in all clinical laboratories due to resource limitations or availability constraints.[28][29]
Treatment / Management
Topical Therapies
For the mild disease of the oral mucosa and skin, topical therapies can be effective. Moderate to high-potency topical steroids, in gel or ointment form, can be used initially 2 to 3 times daily. The frequency of topical steroid application can be gradually tapered based on the patient's response. To improve the effectiveness of topical therapies, blotting the area with a disposable tissue to remove moisture before applying the medication may be helpful. Patients may apply the medication with a finger or a cotton swab and gently rub it into the affected areas for 30 seconds. Patients should be advised to abstain from eating or drinking for 30 minutes after application to increase absorption.[30]
Customized prosthetic devices, eg, dental trays, can occlude the topical steroid over the affected sites in the mouth.[31] Calcineurin inhibitors (eg, tacrolimus) have also been reported as a topical therapeutic option.[32] If topical therapies are not effective for mild to moderate disease, dapsone may be an effective alternative.[33] Typical dose ranges from 50 to 200 mg daily. Systemic corticosteroids can be used in addition to the dapsone.(B3)
Complications of long-term use of topical steroids are uncommon. A cutaneous application may lead to hypopigmentation and atrophy. Although these adverse effects are not commonly seen in the mucous membranes, the risk for oral candidiasis and herpes simplex reactivation is a concern.[30] In addition to topical therapies, the importance of oral care should be emphasized as a critical part in the treatment of mucous membrane pemphigoid. This consists of brushing teeth with a soft-bristle toothbrush twice daily, flossing daily, and visiting the dentist every 3 to 6 months.[30]
Systemic Therapies
If topical therapies are not effective for mild to moderate disease, dapsone may be an effective alternative.[33] Typical dose ranges from 50 to 200 mg daily. Systemic corticosteroids can be used in addition to the dapsone. For mild to moderate ocular involvement, systemic corticosteroids (prednisone 1 to 2 mg/kg/day) alone or in combination with dapsone can be considered. Proper ocular care is important. Since dry eyes are common with ocular pemphigoid, frequent use of lubricants is recommended in the form of artificial tear drops or petrolatum-based ointments. Cleansing away excess exudates from the eyes helps to prevent secondary bacterial infections.[30](B3)
Immunosuppressive Therapy
For severe or rapidly progressive disease involving the ocular, nasopharyngeal, or anogenital mucosa, a combination of systemic corticosteroids (prednisone 1 to 2 mg/kg/day) plus an additional immunosuppressive agent has been recommended. Immunosuppressive agents that have shown efficacy include azathioprine 1 to 2 mg/kg/day, mycophenolate mofetil 2 to 2.5 g/day, or cyclophosphamide 1 to 2 mg/kg/day.[30][34][35][36][37] (B2)
The goal of adjuvant immunosuppressive therapy is to allow the taper of prednisone over 6 to 12 months. Intravenous immunoglobulin has been successfully used to treat cicatricial pemphigoid.[38][39] Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors have been used in the treatment of cicatricial pemphigoid.[40][41] Rituximab has been used alone or as adjuvant therapy for the treatment of mucous membrane pemphigoid.[42][43] (B2)
Differential Diagnosis
Cicatricial pemphigoid has clinical features that closely resemble and must subsequently be differentiated from the following dermatoses:
- Bullous pemphigoid: Bullous pemphigoid is a common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disorder. The age of onset is typically between 65 and 75 years. This typically affects the skin and presents as tense bullae on a normal or urticarial background. This is less commonly affected by the oral mucosa. Lesions do not cause scarring.[13] The disease is typically steroid-responsive.
- Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA): This condition represents a rare autoimmune subepidermal blistering disorder. The most common clinical manifestation involves the formation of noninflammatory, tense bullae, typically appearing on extensor surfaces following friction or trauma. Frequently affected areas include the hands, elbows, knees, and buttocks. These blisters often heal with residual scarring and the formation of milia. Oral involvement may also occur in affected individuals.[13] EBA can present in association with underlying systemic diseases, suggesting an immune-mediated pathogenesis linked to broader autoimmune dysregulation. Management of EBA remains particularly challenging, as the condition tends to be recalcitrant to standard therapies.[44]
- Linear IgA bullous dermatosis: This is a rare subepidermal bullous dermatosis. Its clinical presentation varies and can mimic bullous pemphigoid, dermatitis herpetiformis, and cicatricial pemphigoid. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis may have oral and, less likely, ocular involvement.[45][46]
- Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus: Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disorder that develops in patients with systemic lupus. The eruption consists of erythematous macules, plaques, and bullae that typically occur in sun-exposed areas and do not usually result in scarring. Oral lesions can occur.
- Paraneoplastic pemphigus: This condition is a rare autoimmune disease associated with malignancy, most commonly non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. This condition is characterized by painful and erosive stomatitis, as well as polymorphous cutaneous lesions that may resemble those of bullous pemphigoid, lichen planus, or erythema multiforme. Indirect immunofluorescence on rodent bladder can detect serum autoantibodies directed against plakin proteins. This is rapidly progressive and often results in death.[13]
- Pseudo-ocular cicatricial pemphigoid: This condition closely mimics the clinical presentation of true cicatricial pemphigoid but arises from a distinct etiology and is a complication associated with the prolonged use of medicated eye drops, which are commonly prescribed for the management of glaucoma. Unlike cicatricial pemphigoid, which typically involves both eyes, pseudo-ocular forms generally affect only 1 eye. Disease progression usually halts once the offending eye drops are discontinued.[47]
Prognosis
Cicatricial pemphigoid represents a chronic and progressive autoimmune disease characterized by scarring of the affected tissues. Long-term follow-up remains essential for monitoring complications related to fibrosis and the potential for relapse. The risk of serious sequelae, including blindness and airway obstruction, underscores the importance of initiating treatment early and with sufficient intensity to control disease activity.
Management often requires an interprofessional approach, involving dermatologists, ophthalmologists, otolaryngologists, dentists, and other specialists to address the multisite involvement and prevent functional impairment. While some individuals respond well to immunosuppressive therapy and achieve durable remission, others experience refractory disease that fails to respond or relapses shortly after initial control. These cases demand close monitoring and tailored therapeutic strategies to optimize outcomes.[13]
Complications
Complications associated with cicatricial pemphigoid vary depending on the mucosal surfaces involved. Oral mucosal involvement often leads to painful scarring lesions and the formation of adhesions, which may restrict oral movement. Gingival disease can lead to dental caries, loss of gingival tissue, destruction of alveolar bone, and ultimately, tooth loss.
Ocular complications may include persistent irritation, reduced tear and mucin production, secondary infections, and the development of symblepharons and ankyloblepharons. These changes can lead to corneal irritation, neovascularization, ulceration, and, in advanced cases, blindness. Nasal involvement frequently causes discharge, epistaxis, crusting, chronic sinusitis, scarring, and impaired nasal airflow. Pharyngeal disease may present with hoarseness, progressive loss of voice, supraglottic stenosis, and potentially life-threatening airway compromise.
Involvement of the esophagus may lead to symptoms, eg, dysphagia, odynophagia, aspiration, and stricture formation. Anogenital complications typically include painful ulcerations and the development of stenoses and strictures, which can significantly affect function and quality of life.
Consultations
An interprofessional treatment strategy offers the most effective approach for managing patients with cicatricial pemphigoid. Comprehensive physical examination and a complete review of systems help determine the need for referrals to various specialties. Management may involve collaboration among dermatology, ophthalmology, dentistry, otolaryngology, gastroenterology, colorectal surgery, and gynecology, depending on the sites of involvement.
Control of disease activity through appropriate medical therapy must precede any surgical intervention. Surgical correction of adhesions or strictures performed during active disease may exacerbate inflammation and provoke disease flares.[13] Coordinated care ensures that surgical procedures are timed appropriately and that long-term outcomes are optimized.
Deterrence and Patient Education
Patients should be counseled on the chronic nature of cicatricial pemphigoid, its possible recalcitrant course, and serious complications. Due to the potential for serious complications, the patient should be counseled to remain compliant with medical therapy and attend regular follow-up visits with the appropriate specialists. Patients should be educated on proper oral and ocular hygiene as clinically appropriate. To achieve enhanced compliance with medical therapies, patients should be educated regarding adverse effects and proper usage of their medications.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
The management of cicatricial pemphigoid requires an interprofessional approach based on collaborative expertise, proactive communication, and patient-centered strategies. Physicians and advanced practitioners play a pivotal role in recognizing early clinical signs, confirming diagnosis, and initiating timely referrals to dermatologists and other specialists based on mucosal involvement. As this disease can lead to complications such as blindness, airway obstruction, and esophageal or genitourinary strictures, comprehensive organ-specific assessments must be prioritized. Dermatologists typically oversee systemic immunosuppressive regimens, often starting with high-dose corticosteroids and transitioning to biologic agents. These treatments require regular monitoring for adverse effects, including an increased risk of infection, metabolic disturbances, and bone loss.
Nurses remain essential in tracking disease activity, reinforcing medication adherence, and providing education about symptom management, hygiene, and warning signs of complications. Pharmacists optimize medication safety by reviewing regimens for drug interactions, counseling patients on adverse effects, and ensuring proper immunosuppressive dosing. Coordination among ophthalmologists, dentists, otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, and gynecologists ensures that each aspect of mucosal involvement receives timely attention. Consistent interprofessional communication through shared documentation, case conferences, or virtual check-ins enhances team performance and promotes safety. By fostering this integrated care model, clinicians can mitigate disease progression, reduce avoidable complications, and improve outcomes and quality of life for patients facing the long-term burden of cicatricial pemphigoid.
References
Du G, Patzelt S, van Beek N, Schmidt E. Mucous membrane pemphigoid. Autoimmunity reviews. 2022 Apr:21(4):103036. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103036. Epub 2022 Jan 4 [PubMed PMID: 34995762]
Schonberg S, Stokkermans TJ. Ocular Pemphigoid. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 30252356]
Balding SD, Prost C, Diaz LA, Bernard P, Bedane C, Aberdam D, Giudice GJ. Cicatricial pemphigoid autoantibodies react with multiple sites on the BP180 extracellular domain. The Journal of investigative dermatology. 1996 Jan:106(1):141-6 [PubMed PMID: 8592065]
Domloge-Hultsch N, Gammon WR, Briggaman RA, Gil SG, Carter WG, Yancey KB. Epiligrin, the major human keratinocyte integrin ligand, is a target in both an acquired autoimmune and an inherited subepidermal blistering skin disease. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1992 Oct:90(4):1628-33 [PubMed PMID: 1401088]
Tyagi S, Bhol K, Natarajan K, Livir-Rallatos C, Foster CS, Ahmed AR. Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid antigen: partial sequence and biochemical characterization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996 Dec 10:93(25):14714-9 [PubMed PMID: 8962120]
Bernard P, Vaillant L, Labeille B, Bedane C, Arbeille B, Denoeux JP, Lorette G, Bonnetblanc JM, Prost C. Incidence and distribution of subepidermal autoimmune bullous skin diseases in three French regions. Bullous Diseases French Study Group. Archives of dermatology. 1995 Jan:131(1):48-52 [PubMed PMID: 7826096]
Zillikens D, Wever S, Roth A, Weidenthaler-Barth B, Hashimoto T, Bröcker EB. Incidence of autoimmune subepidermal blistering dermatoses in a region of central Germany. Archives of dermatology. 1995 Aug:131(8):957-8 [PubMed PMID: 7669112]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLaskaris G, Sklavounou A, Stratigos J. Bullous pemphigoid, cicatricial pemphigoid, and pemphigus vulgaris. A comparative clinical survey of 278 cases. Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology. 1982 Dec:54(6):656-62 [PubMed PMID: 6760033]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceHong GH, Khan IR, Shifera AS, Okeagu C, Thorne JE. Incidence and Clinical Characteristics of Ocular Involvement in Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2019:27(5):821-825. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2018.1455879. Epub 2018 Apr 19 [PubMed PMID: 29672212]
Chan LS, Wang T, Wang XS, Hammerberg C, Cooper KD. High frequency of HLA-DQB1*0301 allele in patients with pure ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). 1994:189 Suppl 1():99-101 [PubMed PMID: 8049575]
Lee JB, Liu Y, Hashimoto T. Cicatricial pemphigoid sera specifically react with the most C-terminal portion of BP180. Journal of dermatological science. 2003 Jun:32(1):59-64 [PubMed PMID: 12788530]
Bédane C, McMillan JR, Balding SD, Bernard P, Prost C, Bonnetblanc JM, Diaz LA, Eady RA, Giudice GJ. Bullous pemphigoid and cicatricial pemphigoid autoantibodies react with ultrastructurally separable epitopes on the BP180 ectodomain: evidence that BP180 spans the lamina lucida. The Journal of investigative dermatology. 1997 Jun:108(6):901-7 [PubMed PMID: 9182819]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceFleming TE, Korman NJ. Cicatricial pemphigoid. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2000 Oct:43(4):571-91; quiz 591-4 [PubMed PMID: 11004612]
Bhol KC, Dans MJ, Simmons RK, Foster CS, Giancotti FG, Ahmed AR. The autoantibodies to alpha 6 beta 4 integrin of patients affected by ocular cicatricial pemphigoid recognize predominantly epitopes within the large cytoplasmic domain of human beta 4. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950). 2000 Sep 1:165(5):2824-9 [PubMed PMID: 10946315]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLi X, Qian H, Sogame R, Hirako Y, Tsuruta D, Ishii N, Koga H, Tsuchisaka A, Jin Z, Tsubota K, Fukumoto A, Sotozono C, Kinoshita S, Hashimoto T. Integrin β4 is a major target antigen in pure ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid. European journal of dermatology : EJD. 2016 Jun 1:26(3):247-53. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2016.2772. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27193492]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceFoster CS. Cicatricial pemphigoid. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 1986:84():527-663 [PubMed PMID: 3296406]
Gallagher G, Shklar G. Oral involvement in mucous membrane pemphigoid. Clinics in dermatology. 1987 Jan-Mar:5(1):18-27 [PubMed PMID: 3552187]
Branisteanu DC, Stoleriu G, Branisteanu DE, Boda D, Branisteanu CI, Maranduca MA, Moraru A, Stanca HT, Zemba M, Balta F. Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (Review). Experimental and therapeutic medicine. 2020 Oct:20(4):3379-3382. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8972. Epub 2020 Jul 7 [PubMed PMID: 32905166]
Rimoni O, Ghanem W, Marcovich A, Einan-Lifshitz A. [OCULAR CICATRICIAL PEMPHIGOID]. Harefuah. 2025 Mar:164(3):163-168 [PubMed PMID: 40134155]
Mondino BJ, Linstone FA. Ocular pemphigoid. Clinics in dermatology. 1987 Jan-Mar:5(1):28-35 [PubMed PMID: 3552188]
Besagar S, London AO, Jairam MP, Trief D, Dagi Glass LR. Chronic Early-Stage Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2021 Nov-Dec 01:37(6):e209-e213. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002021. Epub [PubMed PMID: 34293790]
Hanson RD, Olsen KD, Rogers RS 3rd. Upper aerodigestive tract manifestations of cicatricial pemphigoid. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1988 Sep-Oct:97(5 Pt 1):493-9 [PubMed PMID: 3052224]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceHardy KM, Perry HO, Pingree GC, Kirby TJ Jr. Benign mucous membrane pemphigoid. Archives of dermatology. 1971 Nov:104(5):467-75 [PubMed PMID: 5120174]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceLever WF. Pemphigus and pemphigoid. A review of the advances made since 1964. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1979 Jul:1(1):2-31 [PubMed PMID: 387823]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceBean SF, Waisman M, Michel B, Thomas CI, Knox JM, Levine M. Cicatricial pemphigoid. Immunofluorescent studies. Archives of dermatology. 1972 Aug:106(2):195-9 [PubMed PMID: 4558699]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLeonard JN, Wright P, Williams DM, Gilkes JJ, Haffenden GP, McMinn RM, Fry L. The relationship between linear IgA disease and benign mucous membrane pemphigoid. The British journal of dermatology. 1984 Mar:110(3):307-14 [PubMed PMID: 6365149]
Shimanovich I, Nitz JM, Zillikens D. Multiple and repeated sampling increases the sensitivity of direct immunofluorescence testing for the diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2017 Oct:77(4):700-705.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jul 1 [PubMed PMID: 28676329]
Yasukochi A, Teye K, Ishii N, Hashimoto T. Clinical and Immunological Studies of 332 Japanese Patients Tentatively Diagnosed as Anti-BP180-type Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: A Novel BP180 C-terminal Domain Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay. Acta dermato-venereologica. 2016 Aug 23:96(6):762-7. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2407. Epub [PubMed PMID: 26984589]
Sezin T, Egozi E, Hillou W, Avitan-Hersh E, Bergman R. Anti-laminin-332 mucous membrane pemphigoid developing after a diphtheria tetanus vaccination. JAMA dermatology. 2013 Jul:149(7):858-62. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.741. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23700098]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceKnudson RM, Kalaaji AN, Bruce AJ. The management of mucous membrane pemphigoid and pemphigus. Dermatologic therapy. 2010 May-Jun:23(3):268-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2010.01323.x. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20597945]
Aufdemorte TB, De Villez RL, Parel SM. Modified topical steroid therapy for the treatment of oral mucous membrane pemphigoid. Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology. 1985 Mar:59(3):256-60 [PubMed PMID: 3885134]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceAssmann T, Becker J, Ruzicka T, Megahed M. Topical tacrolimus for oral cicatricial pemphigoid. Clinical and experimental dermatology. 2004 Nov:29(6):674-6 [PubMed PMID: 15550151]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceRogers RS 3rd, Seehafer JR, Perry HO. Treatment of cicatricial (benign mucous membrane) pemphigoid with dapsone. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1982 Feb:6(2):215-23 [PubMed PMID: 7037880]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceMegahed M, Schmiedeberg S, Becker J, Ruzicka T. Treatment of cicatricial pemphigoid with mycophenolate mofetil as a steroid-sparing agent. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2001 Aug:45(2):256-9 [PubMed PMID: 11464188]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceNottage JM, Hammersmith KM, Murchison AP, Felipe AF, Penne R, Raber I. Treatment of mucous membrane pemphigoid with mycophenolate mofetil. Cornea. 2013 Jun:32(6):810-5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31826af7b8. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23132447]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidencePasadhika S, Kempen JH, Newcomb CW, Liesegang TL, Pujari SS, Rosenbaum JT, Thorne JE, Foster CS, Jabs DA, Levy-Clarke GA, Nussenblatt RB, Suhler EB. Azathioprine for ocular inflammatory diseases. American journal of ophthalmology. 2009 Oct:148(4):500-509.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.05.008. Epub 2009 Jul 1 [PubMed PMID: 19570522]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidencePujari SS, Kempen JH, Newcomb CW, Gangaputra S, Daniel E, Suhler EB, Thorne JE, Jabs DA, Levy-Clarke GA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, Foster CS. Cyclophosphamide for ocular inflammatory diseases. Ophthalmology. 2010 Feb:117(2):356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.060. Epub 2009 Dec 6 [PubMed PMID: 19969366]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceLetko E, Miserocchi E, Daoud YJ, Christen W, Foster CS, Ahmed AR. A nonrandomized comparison of the clinical outcome of ocular involvement in patients with mucous membrane (cicatricial) pemphigoid between conventional immunosuppressive and intravenous immunoglobulin therapies. Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.). 2004 Jun:111(3):303-10 [PubMed PMID: 15183151]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceMa L, You C, Hernandez M, Maleki A, Lasave A, Schmidt A, Stephenson A, Zhao T, Anesi S, Foster CS. Management of Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid with Intravenous Immunoglobulin Monotherapy. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2019:27(4):636-642. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2018.1433302. Epub 2018 Mar 8 [PubMed PMID: 29517945]
Sacher C, Rubbert A, König C, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Krieg T, Hunzelmann N. Treatment of recalcitrant cicatricial pemphigoid with the tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonist etanercept. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2002 Jan:46(1):113-5 [PubMed PMID: 11756956]
Level 3 (low-level) evidencePrey S, Robert PY, Drouet M, Sparsa A, Roux C, Bonnetblanc JM, Bédane C. Treatment of ocular cicatricial pemphigoid with the tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonist etanercept. Acta dermato-venereologica. 2007:87(1):74-5 [PubMed PMID: 17225020]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceMaley A, Warren M, Haberman I, Swerlick R, Kharod-Dholakia B, Feldman R. Rituximab combined with conventional therapy versus conventional therapy alone for the treatment of mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP). Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2016 May:74(5):835-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 28 [PubMed PMID: 26936298]
Shetty S, Ahmed AR. Critical analysis of the use of rituximab in mucous membrane pemphigoid: a review of the literature. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2013 Mar:68(3):499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.018. Epub 2012 Nov 27 [PubMed PMID: 23200198]
Roenigk HH Jr, Ryan JG, Bergfeld WF. Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. Report of three cases and review of all published cases. Archives of dermatology. 1971 Jan:103(1):1-10 [PubMed PMID: 4321800]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceJoseph TI, Sathyan P, Goma Kumar KU. Linear IgA dermatosis adult variant with oral manifestation: A rare case report. Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. 2015 Jan-Apr:19(1):83-7. doi: 10.4103/0973-029X.157207. Epub [PubMed PMID: 26097313]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceRamos-Castellón C, Ortiz-Nieva G, Fresán F, Villalvazo L, Garfias Y, Navas A, Jiménez-Martínez MC. Ocular involvement and blindness secondary to linear IgA dermatosis. Journal of ophthalmology. 2010:2010():280396. doi: 10.1155/2010/280396. Epub 2010 Dec 22 [PubMed PMID: 21234343]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceFiore PM, Jacobs IH, Goldberg DB. Drug-induced pemphigoid. A spectrum of diseases. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 1987 Dec:105(12):1660-3 [PubMed PMID: 3318771]
Level 3 (low-level) evidence