Back To Search Results

Otoscopy

Editor: Prasanna Tadi Updated: 1/20/2025 12:38:36 AM

Definition/Introduction

The first description of the otoscope is attributed to Joseph Toynbee's aural speculum in 1850. Still, the predecessor of the modern otoscope is closer to the instrument used by John Brunton almost 15 years later. [1] In 1893, Adam Politzer famously used the otoscope to link normal otoscopic examinations with the pathology of otosclerosis.

Otoscopy is an essential clinical tool used to evaluate and diagnose conditions and diseases of the external and middle ear. This procedure involves examining the structures of the ear, specifically the external auditory canal, tympanic membrane, and middle ear. Clinicians perform otoscopies during routine wellness check-ups and when assessing specific ear-related complaints.[2] 

During an otoscopic examination, a clinician uses an otoscope, also called an auriscope, to study the ear's anatomy. The clinician holds the otoscope handle and gently inserts the cone into the patient's external auditory canal. The otoscope has a light source and a magnifying lens, illuminating and enlarging the ear structures, allowing for accurate visualization and assessing their health. Most otoscopes come with disposable cone tips to prevent contamination. The magnifying lens typically makes ear structures appear 75% larger than they would appear to the naked eye, enlarging about 8 diopters. Traditional otoscopy includes a rubber or plastic bulb attachment to push air through the speculum for pneumatic otoscopy, which assesses the middle ear and tympanic membrane mobility and integrity.

The otoscopic examination may identify the following: 

  • Otitis externa
  • External auditory canal exostoses
  • Cerumen impaction
  • Ear foreign bodies
  • Acute and chronic otitis media
  • Myringosclerosis (tympanosclerosis)
  • Tympanic membrane perforations
  • Cholesteatoma
  • Trauma

The latest digital otoscopes include a camera, light-emitting diode (LED) lighting, and improved magnification. Moreover, smartphone-enabled otoscopy has emerged with initial success, especially as a potential diagnostic tool for middle ear diseases using a telemedicine approach.[3] Most otolaryngologists use micro-otoscopy (examining the ear under a microscope) for further examination. 

Issues of Concern

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Issues of Concern

Otoscopy is commonly conducted during the physical examination of the head and neck. Effective use of an otoscope is a crucial skill taught to most healthcare professionals, and mastering this device requires practice. The otoscope serves multiple purposes, from routine wellness checks to assessing specific ear-related issues such as otitis media, otitis externa, cerumen impaction, tympanic membrane perforations, retraction pockets that may contain cholesteatoma, and tumors.[2][4][5] Understanding otoscopy and its diagnostic uses is crucial for healthcare professionals across various fields. Most healthcare training includes basic hearing screening techniques, such as tuning forks to conduct Weber and Rinne tests.

Otoscopic examination is an integral part of the diagnosis of several pathologies of the ear. There are multiple factors, however, that can make successful otoscopic examination difficult. Such factors can subsequently lead to ineffective care, as the belief is that approximately 75% of the tympanic membrane must be visualized by otoscopy for a reliable diagnosis.[2] 

Traditional otoscopy limitations may include the following: 

  • Inadequate training and lack of provider confidence 
  • Patient discomfort and non-compliance
  • Inadequate patient positioning
  • Cerumen impaction
  • Poor lighting
  • Poor visualization
  • Inadequate time for evaluation
  • Suboptimal environments for use [2][6][7]

Although the otoscope has not undergone significant changes, recent advancements have greatly improved its lighting, magnification, photography, and video capabilities. One of the most significant developments is the enhanced ability for clinicians to share otoscopy findings, particularly with experienced specialists. Many otologists employ various techniques to evaluate complex clinical situations.

Clinical Significance

Otoscopic evaluation of the tympanic membrane and middle ear can help healthcare providers diagnose various conditions, including acute otitis media, traumatic perforation of the tympanic membrane, cholesteatoma, ear canal trauma, foreign bodies, and tumors. Delayed diagnosis of ear pathologies can lead to more severe complications, highlighting the importance of otoscopy. For example, although rare, untreated acute otitis media and cholesteatoma can progress to serious issues such as mastoiditis, brain abscesses, or meningitis.[8][9][10][11]

Several sizes of ear specula are typically available when using an otoscope. Clinicians should select the largest speculum that fits comfortably in the patient's external auditory canal, as this will provide the best lighting and allow for optimal visualization of the ear anatomy. Choosing a clean, disposable ear tip or one adequately sanitized to ensure patient safety is crucial.

Given their frequent use, otoscopes pose a potential risk for the spread of infection. Research indicates that more than 40% of otoscopes may be contaminated with potentially pathogenic microorganisms, including Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Aspergillus, and Candida species.[12] Otoscope heads need to be cleaned regularly because maintaining the equipment used in otoscopic exams is crucial. Various members of the healthcare team can perform this task. To clean the otoscope heads, use a cloth that has been dampened with aldehydes, surfactants, or alcohol.[12] Clinicians should refer to the otoscope manufacturer's instructions for specific cleaning protocols. This practice can help reduce the risk of nosocomial infections.

Clinicians may have different preferences for holding the otoscope, but a common recommendation is to grip it like a pen between the first and second fingers. Generally, the otoscope is held in the right hand when examining the patient's right ear and in the left hand for the left ear; however, this may vary according to individual preference. Additionally, the clinician should place a free finger against the patient's cheek to offer support and stability during the examination. This technique prevents accidental injury to the ear canal or tympanic membrane due to patient movement.

To obtain a clear view of the tympanic membrane, the provider should hold the patient's pinna with the hand, not holding the otoscope, and gently pull it to straighten the external auditory canal. For children younger than 12 months, the pinna should be pulled posteriorly and inferiorly, while for adults, it should be pulled posteriorly and superiorly. After this adjustment, the clinician can gently insert the speculum into the patient’s external auditory canal. Discomfort and patient anxiety may limit the exam, so it’s essential to inspect the health of the external auditory canal, noting any signs of inflammation, discharge, cerumen buildup, or infection. The magnifying lens is typically mobile, allowing it to be moved aside for direct access to the ear canal if instrumentation is needed.

The clinician may then slowly progress the speculum into the ear canal until the tympanic membrane becomes visible. They may then evaluate the health of the ear canal and tympanic membrane and observe factors such as color, presence of perforation, and bulging appearance.[13] The clinician may observe tympanic membrane landmarks, including the pars flaccida on the superior aspect of the tympanic membrane, the pars tensa on the posterior aspect, and the light reflex on the inferior and anterior aspect.

Specialists may observe tympanosclerosis or myringosclerosis or any discernable anatomy within the middle ear, such as the ossicular chain, growths, or prominent structures such as the tendon of the stapedius muscle or, rarely, a dehiscent facial nerve. Observation of tympanic membrane landmarks can help the provider evaluate the health of the middle ear. Following the inspection of the tympanic membrane, the provider can slowly remove the otoscope from the patient’s auditory canal. While removing the otoscope, the clinician can continue to observe the auditory canal to evaluate its health or introduce medication as necessary.

Tuning fork tests are usually performed along with otoscopy as screening tests for hearing or for confirmation of pure tone audiometry. The Weber and Rinne tests have been mainly used to establish a diagnosis in patients with unilateral hearing loss and distinguish between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss.[14][15][16] The 512-Hz tuning fork is usually preferred because it best balances tone decay time and tactile vibration.[17] In a person with normal hearing, the Weber test does not lateralize; the sound is heard equally on both sides. In normal hearing ears, the Rinne test shows that air conduction is greater than bone conduction. The interpretation can be summarized as follows using AC (air conduction) and BC (bone conduction): 

  • Unilateral sensorineural hearing loss
    • Weber lateralizes to the unaffected ear
    • Rinne: Affected ear AC>BC and unaffected ear AC>BC.
      • If BC>AC on the affected ear, it indicates a deaf (non-hearing) ear.
  • Unilateral conductive hearing loss
    • Weber lateralizes to the affected ear
    • Rinne: Affected ear BC>AC and unaffected ear AC>BC
  • Symmetric conductive hearing loss
    • Weber does not lateralize
    • Rinne: Affected and unaffected ears BC>AC [18][19]

To address some of the challenges associated with conducting a successful otoscopic examination, video otoscopes have been recently introduced and studied for their effectiveness in diagnosing ear conditions. Video otoscopes enable healthcare professionals to insert a small camera into the patient's external auditory canal, allowing for direct visualization of the tympanic membrane. Research results indicate that video otoscopy may be more effective than traditional otoscopy when assessing pathological conditions of the tympanic membrane.[2]

Another emerging development in otoscopy is the use of telemedical examinations. Telemedicine involves providing remote care to patients through telecommunication technologies and is becoming increasingly significant across various medical fields. Several brands of video otoscopes have been developed to enable the remote transmission of images of the tympanic membrane for healthcare professionals to evaluate. These systems typically operate as attachments for smartphones, allowing them to capture and send otoscopic images of patients to providers remotely. Current research indicates that the quality of otoscopic images obtained via telemedicine varies depending on the video otoscope system employed.[20] The effectiveness of telemedical evaluation of the tympanic membrane depends on its specific condition. For instance, telemedicine provides more accurate assessments of a healthy tympanic membrane or cases involving ear canal exostoses than evaluating a perforated tympanic membrane.[20] There is potential for telemedical evaluation of ear conditions through video-based otoscopy; however, the suitability of this evaluation method may depend on the specific clinical scenario.

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

Otoscopy is a vital component of healthcare professionals' head and neck physical examination. Early identification and management of patients with ear-related conditions are essential for reducing associated morbidity and surrounding structures. Caring for patients with ear diseases requires a collaborative approach among healthcare professionals to ensure patient-centered care and improve overall outcomes.

Clinicians who care for patients with ear diseases and hearing loss—including primary, critical care, and emergency room clinicians; pediatricians; neurologists; neurosurgeons; advanced clinicians, nurses, audiologists, speech therapists, and others—should possess the essential skill of otoscopy. They must also have the knowledge to diagnose and manage ear abnormalities accurately. This expertise includes recognizing diverse clinical presentations and understanding the nuances of otoscopy diagnostic techniques and the use of tuning forks.

A strategic approach is crucial, involving evidence-based strategies to optimize treatment plans and minimize adverse effects. Otoscopy must guide accurate diagnoses and management. Ethical considerations must inform decision-making, ensure patient cooperation, and respect patient autonomy regarding treatment choices when otoscopy reveals otologic and related neurologic abnormalities.

Each healthcare professional must know their responsibilities and contribute their unique expertise to the patient's care plan, fostering a multidisciplinary approach. Effective interprofessional communication is essential, allowing for seamless information exchange and collaborative decision-making among team members. Technological advancements in otoscopy have improved patient care and will continue to do so.

Care coordination plays a key role in ensuring that the patient’s journey from diagnosis through otoscopy to treatment and follow-up is well-planned, minimizing errors and enhancing patient safety. By embracing these principles—skill, strategy, ethics, responsibilities, interprofessional communication, and care coordination—healthcare professionals can deliver patient-centered care, ultimately improving patient outcomes and enhancing team performance in managing ear diseases and hearing loss.

References


[1]

Mudry A. References in the history of otology: the importance of being earnest. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2007 Jan:28(1):135-40     [PubMed PMID: 16988617]


[2]

Damery L, Lescanne E, Reffet K, Aussedat C, Bakhos D. Interest of video-otoscopy for the general practitioner. European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases. 2019 Feb:136(1):13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Nov 2     [PubMed PMID: 30392875]


[3]

Chen CH, Huang CY, Cheng HL, Lin HH, Chu YC, Chang CY, Lai YH, Wang MC, Cheng YF. Smartphone-Enabled versus Conventional Otoscopy in Detecting Middle Ear Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2022 Apr 13:12(4):. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040972. Epub 2022 Apr 13     [PubMed PMID: 35454020]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[4]

Weiss JC, Yates GR, Quinn LD. Acute otitis media: making an accurate diagnosis. American family physician. 1996 Mar:53(4):1200-6     [PubMed PMID: 8629566]


[5]

Isaacson G. Otoscopic diagnosis of otitis media. Minerva pediatrica. 2016 Dec:68(6):470-477     [PubMed PMID: 27196119]


[6]

Hakimi AA, Lalehzarian AS, Lalehzarian SP, Azhdam AM, Nedjat-Haiem S, Boodaie BD. Utility of a smartphone-enabled otoscope in the instruction of otoscopy and middle ear anatomy. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2019 Oct:276(10):2953-2956. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05559-6. Epub 2019 Jul 17     [PubMed PMID: 31317322]


[7]

Davies J, Djelic L, Campisi P, Forte V, Chiodo A. Otoscopy simulation training in a classroom setting: a novel approach to teaching otoscopy to medical students. The Laryngoscope. 2014 Nov:124(11):2594-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.24682. Epub 2014 Aug 28     [PubMed PMID: 24648271]


[8]

Schwartz LE, Brown RB. Purulent otitis media in adults. Archives of internal medicine. 1992 Nov:152(11):2301-4     [PubMed PMID: 1444690]


[9]

Heah H, Soon SR, Yuen HW. A case series of complicated infective otitis media requiring surgery in adults. Singapore medical journal. 2016 Dec:57(12):681-685. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016025. Epub 2016 Feb 4     [PubMed PMID: 26843060]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[10]

Hafidh MA, Keogh I, Walsh RM, Walsh M, Rawluk D. Otogenic intracranial complications. a 7-year retrospective review. American journal of otolaryngology. 2006 Nov-Dec:27(6):390-5     [PubMed PMID: 17084222]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[11]

Leskinen K, Jero J. Acute complications of otitis media in adults. Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery. 2005 Dec:30(6):511-6     [PubMed PMID: 16402975]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[12]

Korkmaz H, Cetinkol Y, Korkmaz M. Cross-contamination and cross-infection risk of otoscope heads. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2013 Nov:270(12):3183-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2539-4. Epub 2013 May 4     [PubMed PMID: 23644940]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[13]

Mankowski NL, Raggio BS. Otoscope Exam. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 31985956]


[14]

Huizing EH. Lateralization of bone conduction into the better ear in conductive deafness. Paradoxical Weber test in unilaterally operated otosclerosis. Acta oto-laryngologica. 1970 Jun:69(6):395-401     [PubMed PMID: 5428267]


[15]

Guindi GM. Lateralization of the Weber response after stapedectomy. British journal of audiology. 1981 May:15(2):97-100     [PubMed PMID: 7225655]


[16]

Blakley BW, Siddique S. A qualitative explanation of the Weber test. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 1999 Jan:120(1):1-4     [PubMed PMID: 9914541]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[17]

Browning GG, Swan IR, Chew KK. Clinical role of informal tests of hearing. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 1989 Jan:103(1):7-11     [PubMed PMID: 2646384]


[18]

. Recommended procedure for Rinne and Weber tuning-fork tests. British Society of Audiology. British journal of audiology. 1987 Aug:21(3):229-30     [PubMed PMID: 3620757]


[19]

Kong EL, Fowler JB. Rinne Test. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 28613725]


[20]

Tötterman M, Jukarainen S, Sinkkonen ST, Klockars T. A Comparison of Four Digital Otoscopes in a Teleconsultation Setting. The Laryngoscope. 2020 Jun:130(6):1572-1576. doi: 10.1002/lary.28340. Epub 2019 Oct 31     [PubMed PMID: 31670399]