Introduction
Vinyl chloride monomer is a colorless, gaseous, sweet-smelling organochloride primarily used in the production of polyvinyl chloride. Historically, it was also used as an aerosol propellant and refrigerant before the 1970s.[1][2][3] Polyvinyl chloride resins are widely used in building materials, construction, and home furnishings, making them nearly ubiquitous in our society.[4] In 1974, 3 cases of hepatic angiosarcoma—an extremely rare cancer—were identified in workers at a vinyl chloride monomer polymerization plant in Kentucky, prompting an extensive occupational epidemiologic investigation that confirmed vinyl chloride monomer as the causative agent.[5][6][7]
Subsequently, the newly formed Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) lowered the vinyl chloride monomer permissible exposure limit from 500 parts per million (ppm) to 1 ppm with an actionable level of 0.5 ppm, forcing industries to adopt workplace practices to comply.[4][5] Vinyl chloride monomer is now classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), confirming the consensus that it is a known carcinogen.[4] In the United States, no cases of vinyl chloride monomer-associated hepatic angiosarcoma are believed to have developed in workers exposed to vinyl chloride monomer exclusively after establishing the 1975 standard.[8][9]
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
Vinyl chloride toxicity primarily results from occupational exposure during the polymerization of vinyl chloride monomer into polyvinyl chloride; however, community exposures secondary to industrial spills have been reported, particularly during vinyl chloride monomer transport between processing facilities, with the most recent incident reported in the United States in 2023.[10][11][12] In addition, there are case reports of significant chronic exposure associated with aerosol propellant use during the 1960s and early 1970s, although vinyl chloride monomer is no longer used in this manner.[3] In developed nations, significant occupational exposures are now rare. However, in developing economies, hepatic angiosarcoma has been documented in workers exposed over the past 10 to 20 years—the typical latent period for hepatic angiosarcoma—suggesting that significant occupational exposures have continued in some settings.[13][14]
In addition to its role in polyvinyl chloride production, trace levels of vinyl chloride monomer are found in cigarette smoke. Moreover, environmental bacteria can degrade polyvinyl chloride waste into vinyl chloride monomer, contributing to potential exposure.[14][15] Persistent low levels can be detected in groundwater near waste sites.[14][16] However, no hepatic angiosarcoma cases have been linked to such low-level exposures.[14]
According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's (ATSDR) 2006 vinyl chloride toxicology profile, vinyl chloride monomer, as a volatile compound, rapidly disperses into the air, limiting its accumulation in environmental reservoirs such as groundwater. A 1996 train derailment resulting in a vinyl chloride monomer spill led to detectable concentrations of 0.06 to 8 ppm in surrounding residential areas. Urine samples from residents, rescue workers, and control groups showed no difference in thiodiacetic acid concentrations, one of the urine biomarkers of vinyl chloride monomer exposure. [IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Chemical Agents and Related Occupations. Vinyl Chloride. 2012.]
Epidemiology
The United States Environmental Protection Agency estimates that 10 to 20 billion lbs (4.5 to 9 billion kg) of vinyl chloride are produced annually in the United States at 15 to 20 locations, many of which are near Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Among exposed workers worldwide, there were reports of 197 cases of vinyl chloride monomer-related hepatic angiosarcoma between 1974 and 2000, with an average latency of 20 years.[14][14] Incidence peaked in the mid-to-late 1970s amongst reactor vessel cleaners believed to have suffered exposure to vinyl chloride monomer levels as high as 3000 ppm.[17]
Pathophysiology
Vinyl chloride monomer is readily absorbed across all body compartments, resulting from acute central nervous system (CNS) and respiratory effects, such as lightheadedness and bronchial irritation at low concentrations. At high concentrations, death can result from CNS and respiratory depression due to a general anesthetic effect.[18]
Chronic exposure among polymerization vessel cleaners is known to cause acroosteolysis, a condition characterized by Raynaud phenomenon and osteolysis in the terminal phalanges of the fingers that is believed to be mediated through obstructive lesions of small peripheral arteries in the distal extremities.[19][20]
The chronic hepatic mutagenic effects of vinyl chloride monomer on hepatocytes and sinusoidal cells are propagated by metabolic activation of vinyl chloride monomer to form chloroethylene oxide, which subsequently binds DNA, thereby exhibiting effects on proto-oncogene and tumor suppressor gene expression. This effect demonstrates causal links to the development of hepatic angiosarcoma, a rare and aggressive cancer, in humans and animal models.[14] Vinyl chloride monomer exposure can increase the risk of cirrhosis and brain, lung, and hematologic cancers.[21]
Toxicokinetics
Vinyl chloride monomer is a highly volatile compound, and inhalation is the primary route of exposure. Vinyl chloride monomer rapidly distributes across all body compartments and undergoes metabolism through CYP2E1 to form epoxide intermediates, which are subsequently detoxified via glutathione conjugation and excreted renally.[22] Animal studies suggest that metabolites are also widely distributed throughout the body but do not accumulate in the tissue, even with chronic exposure. Metabolism follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics.[23][24][25] At low doses, excretion is primarily renal; at higher doses, with enzyme saturation, exhalation of unmetabolized vinyl chloride monomer occurs.[23]
History and Physical
A detailed occupational and environmental exposure history greatly aids the treating clinician but should not delay the treatment of acute, life-threatening toxicity. A detailed history should determine toxin exposure, dose, route, time of exposure, and use of personal protective equipment, including respiratory protection. In acute exposure, symptoms may vary by the degree of exposure, ranging from dizziness, shortness of breath, and headaches to CNS depression, respiratory arrest, and death with severe exposure.[26][27]
Individuals with a history of significant vinyl chloride monomer exposure, whether remote or ongoing, may present with mild acute symptoms or nonspecific systemic symptoms such as malaise, night sweats, and weight loss if malignancy is present.[28] Individuals with vinyl chloride monomer-related hepatic angiosarcoma may not necessarily present with the signs and symptoms of liver failure.[2][7]
Physical examination findings may represent vinyl chloride monomer-induced complications. In acute exposures, respiratory distress or somnolence may be a presenting sign. Complications from significant chronic exposure may manifest as thickened skin over the hands and forefingers, Reynaud phenomenon, acroosteolysis, abdominal distension, ascites, or cachexia in those with advanced hepatic angiosarcoma.
Evaluation
Workers involved in the production and polymerization of vinyl chloride monomer to polyvinyl chloride should undergo routine screening to monitor their level of ongoing exposure. OSHA standard 1910.1017 requires annual occupational medical surveillance of workers exposed to vinyl chloride monomer over the actionable level of 0.5 ppm. The standard mandates laboratory monitoring of total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine transaminase, and gamma-glutamyltransferase at least annually. However, derangements of standard measurements of hepatic function may not be observable until late in the course of hepatic angiosarcoma, and other markers may be more sensitive. A major metabolite of vinyl chloride monomer, thiodiglycolic acid, can also be detected in the urine of workers with occupational exposure.[21] Liver biopsy is the most accurate test for the characteristic pattern of vinyl chloride-induced damage, but it is an invasive procedure with risks that may limit its utility.[29]
Treatment / Management
During suspected or confirmed acute exposures, management begins with the cessation of ongoing exposure by removing the individual from the contaminated area and performing external decontamination. There should be no delay in the movement to fresh air and away from poorly ventilated areas. Gaseous vinyl chloride monomer is denser than air, and low-lying areas may accumulate vinyl chloride monomer gas. Rescue personnel may need Level B or Level A protective gear with a self-contained breathing apparatus to protect themselves during emergency response to industrial accidents or train derailments.[10] According to the ATSDR, contaminated patients can off-gas vinyl chloride monomer in high-volume exposures, and their clothing should be removed to prevent further acute exposure to medical staff. [Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (US). Toxicological Profile for Vinyl Chloride. Health Affects. 2024] Patients with severe respiratory or CNS depression require critical care management during the period of acute intoxication. As a halogenated hydrocarbon, vinyl chloride monomer can sensitize the myocardium to catecholamines, resulting in life-threatening arrhythmias.[26] Therefore, in severe cases, cardiac monitoring is prudent, and adrenergic medications such as epinephrine should be used cautiously.(B3)
Workers presenting with the signs and symptoms of hepatic dysfunction or chronic systemic illness should undergo a specialized evaluation by an occupational medicine physician or medical toxicologist to assess occupational exposure. In addition, a referral to a hepatologist is advised for the evaluation and treatment of vinyl chloride-induced hepatic injury and hepatic angiosarcoma. Treatment options for hepatic angiosarcoma are limited. Thus, prevention of vinyl chloride monomer exposure should be the initial focus of employers.
Differential Diagnosis
The signs and symptoms of mild-to-severe acute vinyl chloride monomer exposure include shortness of breath, cough, dizziness, headaches, respiratory depression, and CNS depression. These symptoms may be due to any number of industrial toxins, particularly other volatile halogenated hydrocarbons. A detailed occupational history can help guide the diagnosis.
The signs and symptoms of chronic occupational exposure to vinyl chloride monomer, including Raynaud phenomenon, thickening of the skin of the hands and forearms, and acroosteolysis of the distal phalanges, collectively can resemble systemic sclerosis. The diagnosis can be differentiated based on the absence of antinuclear antibodies and a history of vinyl chloride monomer exposure. Raynaud phenomenon may also be secondary to mechanical arterial obstruction, hyperviscosity of the blood, or exposure to some chemotherapeutics, environmental conditions, or vibrating tools.[30][31]
The diagnosis of hepatic angiosarcoma should prompt the suspicion of a history of significant vinyl chloride monomer exposure. This rare tumor has also been linked to chronic arsenic exposure, copper sulfate, and a thorium-based radiocontrast, which has not been used for many decades.[32]
Prognosis
Single acute exposures to vinyl chloride monomer typically result in mild symptoms such as dizziness and headaches and have not been clearly associated with long-term effects.[14] In reactor vessel cleaners routinely exposed to elevated vinyl chloride monomer levels before the 1975 OSHA standard, the progression of acroosteolysis slowed with removal from the exposure, with improvement in some cases.[19][33]
A 1973 retrospective cohort study of 1294 highly exposed polymerization workers identified 11 cases of hepatic angiosarcoma, indicating an incidence among these workers many thousands of times higher than in the general population.[34][35] There is no standardized treatment regimen for hepatic angiosarcoma, although partial hepatectomy, liver transplant, and chemotherapy are all used. However, despite intervention, the 2-year survival rate remains as low as 3%.[36][37]
Complications
Minimal complications are the norm from single, mild occupational or environmental exposures. Significant acute exposures can cause respiratory and CNS depression and death. Long-term occupational exposure in workers exposed before the 1975 OSHA standard has been linked to acroosteolysis and hepatic angiosarcoma. Cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, brain cancer, and lung cancer also have correlations with vinyl chloride monomer exposure in these workers, but causation remains controversial.[4] In developing countries with poor regulation of the polyvinyl chloride industry, hepatic angiosarcoma continues to be documented in plant workers, suggesting significant ongoing exposure.[13][14]
Consultations
In cases of suspected toxicity or complications related to vinyl chloride monomer exposure, consultation with a medical toxicologist or poison center is recommended. Hepatologists may be needed for liver-related complications, including hepatic angiosarcoma.
Deterrence and Patient Education
Employers and workplaces are responsible for deterring vinyl chloride monomer exposure. A standard hierarchy of controls approach should be used to reduce or prevent chronic workplace exposure to vinyl chloride monomer. Consultation with industrial hygienists and occupational medicine physicians may be necessary to identify the most effective strategies for reducing workplace exposure to vinyl chloride monomer. Employers must educate workers about the hazards of exposure, including carcinogenicity; appropriate use of personal protective equipment ; standard protocols to mitigate harm during accidental exposure; and methods of occupational medical surveillance.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
In the United States, the cases of hepatic angiosarcoma at the BF Goodrich plant in 1974 prompted further research and swift regulatory action, leading to rapid compliance with a new, more stringent occupational exposure limit. These stringent regulations have effectively prevented new cases of vinyl chloride monomer-induced HAS in the United States since 1975.[8] The cases of hepatic angiosarcoma reported in workers abroad exposed in recent decades reflect the ongoing importance of these efforts.[13][14]
Preventing, detecting, and managing significant occupational vinyl chloride monomer exposure and its complications require a multifaceted, collaborative approach involving occupational health and safety professionals; industrial hygienists; clinicians; governmental agencies, such as OSHA and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; and private industry.
Occupational health nurses and clinicians should be aware that individuals with vinyl chloride monomer exposure complications may require an interprofessional approach involving hepatology, toxicology, dermatology, and rheumatology. Any case of hepatic angiosarcoma in a vinyl chloride monomer-exposed worker should be considered a sentinel occupational health event, requiring a prompt and thorough review of workplace practices to ensure there is no ongoing excess workplace exposure.
Workers presenting with the signs and symptoms of hepatic dysfunction or chronic systemic illness should undergo a specialty evaluation by an occupational medicine physician or medical toxicologist to assess occupational exposure. In addition, a referral to a hepatologist is advised to evaluate and treat vinyl chloride-induced hepatic injury and hepatic angiosarcoma.
Given the rarity of vinyl chloride monomer toxicity in the United States today, toxicology professionals in the clinician and pharmacist disciplines need to be aware of its clinical presentation should they encounter a case. Effective communication among these interprofessional teams is essential, as is the need to contact the appropriate regulatory authorities to prohibit further exposure and remove other workers from a potentially dangerous environment. Management typically begins by contacting a poison center and coordinating necessary reporting with appropriate government agencies. A collaborative, interprofessional approach is crucial to effectively managing these rare cases and preventing future occurrences.
References
Creech JL Jr, Johnson MN. Angiosarcoma of liver in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride. Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association. 1974 Mar:16(3):150-1 [PubMed PMID: 4856325]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceFalk H, Creech JL Jr, Heath CW Jr, Johnson MN, Key MM. Hepatic disease among workers at a vinyl chloride polymerization plant. JAMA. 1974 Oct 7:230(1):59-63 [PubMed PMID: 4547220]
Infante PF, Petty SE, Groth DH, Markowitz G, Rosner D. Vinyl chloride propellant in hair spray and angiosarcoma of the liver among hairdressers and barbers: case reports. International journal of occupational and environmental health. 2009 Jan-Mar:15(1):36-42 [PubMed PMID: 19267125]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSass JB, Castleman B, Wallinga D. Vinyl chloride: a case study of data suppression and misrepresentation. Environmental health perspectives. 2005 Jul:113(7):809-12 [PubMed PMID: 16002366]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Epidemiologic notes and reports. Angiosarcoma of the liver among polyvinyl chloride workers--Kentucky. 1974. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 1997 Feb 7:46(5):97-101 [PubMed PMID: 9045039]
Monson RR, Peters JM, Johnson MN. Proportional mortality among vinyl chloride workers. Environmental health perspectives. 1975 Jun:11():75-7 [PubMed PMID: 17539114]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceBerk PD, Martin JF, Young RS, Creech J, Selikoff IJ, Falk H, Watanabe P, Popper H, Thomas L. Vinyl chloride-associated liver disease. Annals of internal medicine. 1976 Jun:84(6):717-31 [PubMed PMID: 945708]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceCollins JJ, Jammer B, Sladeczek FM, Bodnar CM, Salomon SS. Surveillance for angiosarcoma of the liver among vinyl chloride workers. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2014 Nov:56(11):1207-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000247. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25376416]
Bush NG, Das A, Bowen JA, Fieser ME. Enhancing Rate and Selectivity for Hydrodechlorination of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) with Rh Catalysts. ChemSusChem. 2025 Feb 3:():e202402689. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202402689. Epub 2025 Feb 3 [PubMed PMID: 39899614]
Brinker K, Lumia M, Markiewicz KV, Duncan MA, Dowell C, Rey A, Wilken J, Shumate A, Taylor J, Funk R. Assessment of emergency responders after a vinyl chloride release from a train derailment - New Jersey, 2012. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2015 Jan 9:63(53):1233-7 [PubMed PMID: 25577988]
Bashir H, Mahalwar G, Henry T. The East Palestine Disaster: The Potential Toxic Effects of Vinyl Chloride Exposure on Cardiovascular Health. Cureus. 2023 Oct:15(10):e46835. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46835. Epub 2023 Oct 11 [PubMed PMID: 37954788]
Toxic-Free Future, Material Research L3C. Toxic Cargo: How Rail Transport of Vinyl Chloride Puts Millions at Risk, an Analysis One Year After the Ohio Train Derailment. New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS. 2025 Feb:34(4):327-340. doi: 10.1177/10482911241303930. Epub 2024 Dec 20 [PubMed PMID: 39704136]
Hozo I, Andelinović S, Ljutić D, Mirić D, Bojić L, Gaspercić I. Vinylchloride monomer exposure by the plastic industry workers basic condition for liver angiosarcoma appearance. Medicinski arhiv. 1996:50(1-2):9-14 [PubMed PMID: 9277092]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceKielhorn J, Melber C, Wahnschaffe U, Aitio A, Mangelsdorf I. Vinyl chloride: still a cause for concern. Environmental health perspectives. 2000 Jul:108(7):579-88 [PubMed PMID: 10905993]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceHoffmann D, Patrianakos C, Brunnemann KD, Gori GB. Chromatographic determination of vinyl chloride in tobacco smoke. Analytical chemistry. 1976 Jan:48(1):47-50 [PubMed PMID: 1244767]
Wang Y, Li G, Li X, Yang Y, Ding K, Xing S, Zhang Y, Zhang L. Human Health Risk Assessment of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Groundwater Based on Multi-Pathway Analysis. Toxics. 2024 Dec 9:12(12):. doi: 10.3390/toxics12120894. Epub 2024 Dec 9 [PubMed PMID: 39771109]
Barnes AW. Vinyl chloride and the production of PVC. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1976 Apr:69(4):277-81 [PubMed PMID: 1265038]
OSTER RH, CARR CJ. Anesthesia; narcosis with vinyl chloride. Anesthesiology. 1947 Jul:8(4):359-61 [PubMed PMID: 20255056]
Wilson RH, McCormick WE, Tatum CF, Creech JL. Occupational acroosteolysis. Report of 31 cases. JAMA. 1967 Aug 21:201(8):577-81 [PubMed PMID: 5006758]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceHarris DK, Adams WG. Acro-osteolysis occurring in men engaged in the polymerization of vinyl chloride. British medical journal. 1967 Sep 16:3(5567):712-4 [PubMed PMID: 6038365]
Barsouk A, Thandra KC, Saginala K, Rawla P, Barsouk A. Chemical Risk Factors of Primary Liver Cancer: An Update. Hepatic medicine : evidence and research. 2020:12():179-188. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S278070. Epub 2021 Jan 5 [PubMed PMID: 33447099]
Sherman M. Vinyl chloride and the liver. Journal of hepatology. 2009 Dec:51(6):1074-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.09.012. Epub 2009 Oct 1 [PubMed PMID: 19836850]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceBolt HM. Pharmacokinetics of vinyl chloride. General pharmacology. 1978:9(2):91-5 [PubMed PMID: 350701]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceBolt HM. Vinyl chloride-a classical industrial toxicant of new interest. Critical reviews in toxicology. 2005 Apr-May:35(4):307-23 [PubMed PMID: 15989139]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceWatanabe PG, Zempel JA, Gehring PJ. Comparison of the fate of vinyl chloride following single and repeated exposure in rats. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 1978 May:44(2):391-9 [PubMed PMID: 675709]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLee CC, Bhandari JC, Winston JM, House WB, Peters PJ, Dixon RL, Woods JS. Inhalation toxicity of vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride. Environmental health perspectives. 1977 Dec:21():25-32 [PubMed PMID: 565702]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceProdan L, Suciu I, Pîslaru V, Ilea E, Pascu L. Experimental acute toxicity of vinyl chloride (monochloroethene). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1975 Jan 31:246():154-8 [PubMed PMID: 1054948]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceFiechtner JJ, Reyes CN Jr. Angiosarcoma of the liver in a rural population. Four cases diagnosed in a 29-month period. JAMA. 1976 Oct 11:236(15):1704-6 [PubMed PMID: 989515]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLiss GM, Greenberg RA, Tamburro CH. Use of serum bile acids in the identification of vinyl chloride hepatotoxicity. The American journal of medicine. 1985 Jan:78(1):68-76 [PubMed PMID: 3966491]
Fardoun MM, Nassif J, Issa K, Baydoun E, Eid AH. Raynaud's Phenomenon: A Brief Review of the Underlying Mechanisms. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2016:7():438 [PubMed PMID: 27899893]
Lopez V, Chamoux A, Tempier M, Thiel H, Ughetto S, Trousselard M, Naughton G, Dutheil F. The long-term effects of occupational exposure to vinyl chloride monomer on microcirculation: a cross-sectional study 15 years after retirement. BMJ open. 2013 Jun 20:3(6):. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002785. Epub 2013 Jun 20 [PubMed PMID: 23794583]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceTakekawa S, Ueda Y, Hiramatsu Y, Komiyama K, Munechika H. History note: tragedy of Thorotrast. Japanese journal of radiology. 2015 Nov:33(11):718-22. doi: 10.1007/s11604-015-0479-1. Epub 2015 Sep 29 [PubMed PMID: 26416314]
Ishikawa O, Warita S, Tamura A, Miyachi Y. Occupational scleroderma. A 17-year follow-up study. The British journal of dermatology. 1995 Nov:133(5):786-9 [PubMed PMID: 8555035]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceWaxweiler RJ, Stringer W, Wagoner JK, Jones J, Falk H, Carter C. Neoplastic risk among workers exposed to vinyl chloride. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1976:271():40-8 [PubMed PMID: 1069531]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceLocker GY, Doroshow JH, Zwelling LA, Chabner BA. The clinical features of hepatic angiosarcoma: a report of four cases and a review of the English literature. Medicine. 1979 Jan:58(1):48-64 [PubMed PMID: 368508]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceMolina E, Hernandez A. Clinical manifestations of primary hepatic angiosarcoma. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2003 Apr:48(4):677-82 [PubMed PMID: 12741455]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceMillan M, Delgado A, Caicedo LA, Arrunategui AM, Meneses CA, Villegas JI, Serrano O, Caicedo L, Duque M, Echeverri GJ. Liver Angiosarcoma: Rare tumour associated with a poor prognosis, literature review and case report. International journal of surgery case reports. 2016:28():165-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.09.044. Epub 2016 Sep 29 [PubMed PMID: 27718433]
Level 3 (low-level) evidence