Introduction
Vasoactive intestinal peptide tumors (VIPomas) are rare neuroendocrine tumors characterized by unregulated secretion of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), leading to a distinct clinical syndrome. Werner and Morrison first described them in 1958 as a pancreatic tumor resulting in watery diarrhea and hypokalemia, coining the term Verner-Morrison syndrome after its discoverers.[1] While VIPomas are unusual, they encompass 2% of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. They secrete excessive VIP, which primarily affects the gastrointestinal (GI) system and can cause effects secondary to the secretion of water and electrolytes from the GI epithelial cells. The tumor usually presents as a firm, homogenous, and well-circumscribed lesion with histology consistent with that of other well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.
VIPoma is characterized by fasting-persistent watery diarrhea accompanied by hypokalemia and dehydration, collectively referred to as WDHA syndrome (eg, watery diarrhea, hypokalemia, and achlorhydria). VIPoma symptoms may often overlap with more common GI conditions like laxative abuse, colitis, malabsorption, or inflammatory bowel disease. Therefore, the diagnosis of VIPoma is dependent upon VIP levels greater than 250 pg/mL. Multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans in conjunction with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy are imaging techniques that aid in diagnosis and tumor localization.
Management is primarily complete surgical resection with somatostatin analogs for medical optimization and symptom control. VIPomas can cause life-threatening electrolyte abnormalities, and most tumors are considered malignant with a median survival of 8 years (dependent on tumor grade, stage, and resectability).[2] Ultimately, the complications of this tumor are related to the symptoms associated with the primary tumor’s excessive secretion of VIP, in addition to the complications inherent to surgical resection and metastasis.[3] This course highlights the clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and treatment of VIPomas.
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
VIP is a neurohormone produced in the central nervous system and the neurons of the GI, respiratory, and urogenital tracts. VIP functions as a vasodilator and regulator of smooth muscle activity, a stimulator of water and electrolyte secretion from the intestinal tract, an inhibitor of gastric acid secretion, and a promotor of blood flow mainly in the GI tract.
Epidemiology
VIPomas are rare tumors that are detected in 1 in 1,000,000 people per year.[4] In adults, they are most commonly diagnosed between the ages of 30 and 50 and are intrapancreatic in over 95% of cases. A small proportion of tumors secreting VIP have been reported as colorectal cancer, lung cancer, pheochromocytoma, neurofibroma, and ganglioneuroblastoma. Most VIPomas present as isolated, functioning neuroendocrine tumors predominantly located in the pancreatic body and tail. Approximately 5% of cases are associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome. Notably, over 50% of VIPomas exhibit metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis.[5]
In children, VIPomas are typically diagnosed between the ages of 2 to 4. Most of these tumors in the pediatric population are either ganglioneuromas or ganglioneuroblastomas, arising from the neural crest tissue of the sympathetic ganglia in the mediastinum or retroperitoneum. They may also arise from the adrenal medulla.[6][7]
Pathophysiology
Excessive secretion of VIP from the tumor has multiple effects on different organ systems, primarily the GI system. VIP is a neurotransmitter belonging to the secretin-glucagon family and mediates its effects by binding to the G-protein-coupled receptors for vasoactive intestinal peptides—VPAC1 and VPAC2—expressed in various tissues throughout the body.[8] Upon binding, VIP activates the adenylate cyclase cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling pathway, which increases levels of cAMP with subsequent effects of smooth muscle relaxation. This activation also promotes vasodilation and decreases GI motility, stimulating water, electrolyte, and bicarbonate secretion in the intestines, contributing to the hallmark watery diarrhea observed in VIPoma. Additionally, VIP inhibits gastric acid secretion and promotes glycogenolysis, lipolysis, and bone resorption.
Histopathology
The histopathology of VIPomas is consistent with that of other well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. VIPomas specifically present as a firm, homogenous, and well-circumscribed lesion. They are characterized by nests or cords of uniform cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and round-to-oval nuclei containing fine chromatin, often described as "salt-and-pepper." While immunohistochemistry may reveal positivity for chromogranin A and synaptophysin, staining for VIP is specific and confirms the diagnosis.
Despite their generally low mitotic activity and well-differentiated nature, more than half of VIPomas present with metastasis at the time of diagnosis, commonly involving the liver.[9] VIPomas are usually well-differentiated and fall within the category of grade 1 or grade 2 neuroendocrine tumors based on the World Health Organization classification, depending on the mitotic rate and Ki-67 proliferation index.[10]
History and Physical
Patients with VIPoma most commonly present with watery diarrhea, which is secretory and persists after a 48-hour fast. Diarrhea may be present for several years before diagnosis. Typically, stool amount exceeds 700 mL daily despite fasting and can exceed over 3000 mL in 70% of patients.[11][12] These stools are odorless and tea-colored, resulting in substantial fluid and electrolytes such as potassium losses.
The physical examination of patients with VIPoma often reflects the systemic effects of chronic watery diarrhea, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalances. Typical findings include fatigue, lethargy, and signs of malnutrition due to prolonged fluid loss. Vital signs may reveal hypotension and tachycardia indicative of hypovolemia, while dry skin, decreased skin turgor, and dry mucous membranes are consistent with dehydration. Neuromuscular manifestations, such as muscle weakness, cramps, or diminished reflexes, are frequently observed and are attributable to hypokalemia. If severe, the loss of fluid and electrolytes can result in cardiac arrhythmias, myopathy, tetany, and hypovolemic shock.[13]
Abdominal examination is typically unremarkable, although hepatomegaly may be present in cases of metastatic liver involvement. Additional findings may include clinical features of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), such as hyperparathyroidism or pituitary adenomas. Children with VIPoma may present with failure to thrive in addition to chronic diarrhea.
Evaluation
Laboratory Studies
Diagnosis of VIPoma is made in patients with secretory diarrhea, usually greater than 3 liters per day, with a serum VIP level of around 250 to 500 pg/mL (reference range is less than 190 pg/mL). Secretory diarrhea has a low fecal osmotic gap of less than 50 mOsm/kg. VIP levels must be repeated to confirm diagnosis since levels may not be elevated between episodes of watery diarrhea. VIP levels must also be obtained when the patient is symptomatic, as the VIPoma may only secrete VIP intermittently. Hence, a normal level may be a false negative. Among children suspected of having VIPoma, catecholamine levels should also be measured to differentiate from neuroblastoma. Levels of pancreatic polypeptide are elevated in tumors originating from the pancreas.
Electrolyte abnormalities include hypokalemia, hypochlorhydria, hypomagnesemia, hyperglycemia, and hypercalcemia. Hypokalemia and hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis occur due to a large amount of GI loss and bicarbonate wasting. Hypochlorhydria occurs secondary to the direct gastric acid inhibitory effect of VIP. Hypercalcemia may be due to dehydration, coincidental MEN1 syndrome, or tumor secretion of a calcitrophic peptide. Hypomagnesemia may occur from profound diarrhea. Hyperglycemia is due to the increased glycogenolytic activity of VIP.
Imaging Studies
Tumor localization typically starts with a helical multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan. The sensitivity of multiphasic CT scans is significantly high at greater than 80% for detecting intrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.[14][15] Intravenous (IV) contrast further aids in detecting smaller lesions.
Magnetic resonance imaging is performed in cases of indeterminate lesions and may be more sensitive to detect liver metastasis. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, using the radiolabeled somatostatin analogs octreotide and lanreotide, has the advantage of detecting small, occult metastases within and outside the abdomen. Other techniques include endoscopic ultrasound, which helps determine the accurate extent of the disease and can be used to biopsy the pancreatic lesions. The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved functional positron emission testing imaging technique with 68-Ga DOTATATE injection as the radioactive diagnostic agent for detecting somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumors in adult and pediatric patients.
Treatment / Management
Initial Management
The management of VIPoma involves medical management and surgery, outlined below:
- Initial medical management is aimed mainly at controlling the symptoms by promptly and aggressively replacing fluids and electrolytes.[16]
- Somatostatin analogs like octreotide and lanreotide inhibit the secretion of VIP and are used for symptomatic control. Octreotide is usually started at 50 to 100 mcg subcutaneously every 8 hours and titrated for symptom control. A long-acting formulation of octreotide is initiated at a dose of 20 mg intramuscularly monthly and titrated as needed for optimal symptom control.
- Glucocorticoids are used in patients refractory to somatostatin analogs.[17]
- Interferon-alpha has also been used in patients not responding to the above medications.
- Complete surgical resection is considered the only definitive treatment of choice for nonmetastatic primary tumors and is usually a distal pancreatectomy. If the tumor cannot be excised completely, surgical debulking may provide palliative benefit.[18]
Management of Metastatic/Progressive Disease
Metastases at the time of detection of VIPoma have been noted in over 50% of cases.[19] The metastases most commonly occur in the liver, lymph nodes, bones, and kidney.[20] For metastatic VIPoma, surgical resection is generally not indicated and is typically contraindicated for locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors when achieving a macroscopic radical resection is not feasible.[21][22] However, in cases of limited liver metastases, surgical resection may be considered in the absence of diffuse involvement of both liver lobes, decreased liver function, or extrahepatic metastases. Liver transplantation is a potential treatment option for metastatic VIPoma in highly selected patients with isolated, unresectable liver metastases with no extrahepatic disease.[23] Still, strict eligibility criteria and the risk of recurrence limit its use. (B2)
Radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation have also been the choice of the modality of treatment in cases of small metastases less than 3 cm. Hepatic artery embolization is a palliative treatment in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases.[24] Systemic chemotherapy can be used for poorly differentiated, extrahepatic metastatic, or aggressive disease. Therapy options typically include a combination regimen with streptozocin or temozolomide-based therapy.[25] However, evidence of the overall use of chemotherapy and response in VIPoma is limited. Novel agents like sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and everolimus, an mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, are approved in the United States to treat advanced, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, including VIPomas.[26][27](A1)
Differential Diagnosis
Secretory diarrhea in adults in developed countries can be caused by laxative abuse, carcinoid syndrome, microscopic colitis, and bile salt malabsorption due to ileal resection. Though more common in developing countries, diarrhea caused by infection with Vibrio cholera and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli may also need to be ruled out after careful history assessment. Secretory diarrhea may occasionally occur associated with GI disorders like Crohn disease and short bowel syndrome. Rarely inherited electrolyte transport defects, such as such as congenital chloride and sodium diarrhea, may cause secretory diarrhea in children in children. These are present in early infancy. Munchausen syndrome by proxy may also need to be ruled out in rare cases.
Staging
Like other neuroendocrine tumors, VIPoma is based on the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system developed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. This system considers tumor size, local invasion, lymph node involvement, and distant metastasis. Since more than 50% of VIPomas have metastasized at the time of diagnosis, most patients present with advanced disease (stage IV).
Staging Criteria:
- Primary tumor:
- T1: Tumor ≤2 cm, confined to the pancreas
- T2: Tumor >2 cm but ≤4 cm, confined to the pancreas
- T3: Tumor >4 cm or invading adjacent structures (excluding major vessels)
- T4: Tumor invades adjacent organs or large vessels
- Regional lymph nodes:
- N0: No regional lymph node involvement
- N1: Regional lymph node metastasis present
- Distant metastasis:
- M0: No distant metastasis
- M1: Distant metastasis present (commonly the liver, but may also include bones or lungs)
Stages:
- Stage I: T1, N0, M0
- Stage II: T2 or T3, N0, M0
- Stage III: Any T, N1, M0
- Stage IV: Any T, any N, M1
Prognosis
The median survival of patients with VIPoma is 8 years. Survival is dependent primarily on tumor grade, stage, and surgical resectability. As per recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, the postresection follow-up includes history and physical examination, multiphasic CT or magnetic resonance imaging, and serum VIP level in the initial 3 to 12 months. After 1 year, it is recommended to follow the same measures every 6 to 12 months.[3]
Complications
VIPoma complications can be categorized by risks associated with the primary tumor, risk of metastasis, and risks from treatment. VIPomas can lead to significant complications, primarily due to excessive VIP secretion from the primary tumor, causing severe dehydration, hypokalemia, metabolic acidosis, renal dysfunction, and malnutrition. Metastatic disease can lead to organ dysfunction along with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Treatment for VIPoma also includes complications inherent to surgical and medical management of the disease process.
Deterrence and Patient Education
VIPomas are rare pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and there are no established preventive measures for their occurrence. However, early recognition of symptoms such as chronic, watery diarrhea and associated electrolyte imbalances is crucial for timely diagnosis and management. Patients should be educated to seek medical evaluation if they experience persistent, high-volume diarrhea that does not improve with fasting, particularly when accompanied by dehydration, muscle weakness, or unexplained weight loss. Since VIPomas may be associated with MEN1, individuals with a family history of MEN1 should undergo genetic counseling and regular screening to detect tumors early.
Patient education should also focus on managing symptoms and preventing complications. Patients diagnosed with VIPoma should be counseled on the importance of fluid and electrolyte replacement to avoid dehydration and hypokalemia. They should be aware of potential complications, including arrhythmias and muscle weakness, and understand the need for regular follow-ups with endocrinologists and oncologists. For those undergoing treatment, including surgical resection or somatostatin analog therapy (eg, octreotide), education on medication adherence, potential adverse events, and symptom monitoring is essential. Engaging patients in a multidisciplinary care plan, including dietary modifications and hydration strategies, can improve quality of life and treatment outcomes.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Managing VIPomas requires a multidisciplinary approach involving various clinicians, including physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals to ensure optimal patient-centered care, safety, and outcomes. Early diagnosis and coordinated treatment planning are essential, as delayed recognition can lead to severe dehydration, electrolyte imbalances, and life-threatening complications. Clinicians, particularly endocrinologists, oncologists, and gastroenterologists, must collaborate to identify VIPoma through clinical assessment, laboratory tests, and imaging. Surgeons play a key role in planning tumor resection, while advanced practitioners and nurses provide ongoing symptom management, hydration support, and patient education regarding dietary modifications and medication adherence.
Effective interprofessional communication and care coordination enhance patient safety by preventing mismanaging VIPoma-related complications such as hypokalemia and metabolic acidosis. Pharmacists ensure appropriate electrolyte replacement and medication therapy, including the use of somatostatin analogs like octreotide to control symptoms. Nurses monitor fluid status, administer treatments, and educate patients on self-care strategies, while dietitians help optimize nutrition and hydration. Regular team meetings, clear documentation, and patient-centered discussions improve treatment adherence, minimize hospital readmissions, and optimize long-term outcomes. A well-coordinated approach ultimately enhances team performance, reducing complications and improving the quality of life for patients with VIPoma.
References
VERNER JV, MORRISON AB. Islet cell tumor and a syndrome of refractory watery diarrhea and hypokalemia. The American journal of medicine. 1958 Sep:25(3):374-80 [PubMed PMID: 13571250]
Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Kapoor N, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Shah AS, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, de Herder WW, Hofland J. Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide-Secreting Tumor (VIPoma). Endotext. 2000:(): [PubMed PMID: 25905195]
Keutgen XM, Nilubol N, Kebebew E. Malignant-functioning neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: A survival analysis. Surgery. 2016 May:159(5):1382-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Dec 15 [PubMed PMID: 26704781]
Ito T, Igarashi H, Jensen RT. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: clinical features, diagnosis and medical treatment: advances. Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology. 2012 Dec:26(6):737-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2012.12.003. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23582916]
Level 3 (low-level) evidencePerry RR, Vinik AI. Clinical review 72: diagnosis and management of functioning islet cell tumors. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1995 Aug:80(8):2273-8 [PubMed PMID: 7629220]
Belei OA, Heredea ER, Boeriu E, Marcovici TM, Cerbu S, Mărginean O, Iacob ER, Iacob D, Motoc AGM, Boia ES. Verner-Morrison syndrome. Literature review. Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. 2017:58(2):371-376 [PubMed PMID: 28730220]
Shahid S, Kushner BH, Modak S, Basu EM, Rubin EM, Gundem G, Papaemmanuil E, Roberts SS. Association of BRAF V600E mutations with vasoactive intestinal peptide syndrome in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2021 Oct:68(10):e29265. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29265. Epub 2021 Jul 31 [PubMed PMID: 34331515]
Langer I, Jeandriens J, Couvineau A, Sanmukh S, Latek D. Signal Transduction by VIP and PACAP Receptors. Biomedicines. 2022 Feb 9:10(2):. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10020406. Epub 2022 Feb 9 [PubMed PMID: 35203615]
Kulke MH, Anthony LB, Bushnell DL, de Herder WW, Goldsmith SJ, Klimstra DS, Marx SJ, Pasieka JL, Pommier RF, Yao JC, Jensen RT, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS). NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas. Pancreas. 2010 Aug:39(6):735-52. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181ebb168. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20664472]
Perren A, Couvelard A, Scoazec JY, Costa F, Borbath I, Delle Fave G, Gorbounova V, Gross D, Grossma A, Jense RT, Kulke M, Oeberg K, Rindi G, Sorbye H, Welin S, Antibes Consensus Conference participants. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Pathology: Diagnosis and Prognostic Stratification. Neuroendocrinology. 2017:105(3):196-200. doi: 10.1159/000457956. Epub 2017 Feb 11 [PubMed PMID: 28190015]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGrier JF. WDHA (watery diarrhea, hypokalemia, achlorhydria) syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment. Southern medical journal. 1995 Jan:88(1):22-4 [PubMed PMID: 7817223]
Mekhjian HS, O'Dorisio TM. VIPoma syndrome. Seminars in oncology. 1987 Sep:14(3):282-91 [PubMed PMID: 2820063]
Hofland J, Falconi M, Christ E, Castaño JP, Faggiano A, Lamarca A, Perren A, Petrucci S, Prasad V, Ruszniewski P, Thirlwell C, Vullierme MP, Welin S, Bartsch DK. European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2023 guidance paper for functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour syndromes. Journal of neuroendocrinology. 2023 Aug:35(8):e13318. doi: 10.1111/jne.13318. Epub 2023 Aug 14 [PubMed PMID: 37578384]
Legmann P, Vignaux O, Dousset B, Baraza AJ, Palazzo L, Dumontier I, Coste J, Louvel A, Roseau G, Couturier D, Bonnin A. Pancreatic tumors: comparison of dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 1998 May:170(5):1315-22 [PubMed PMID: 9574609]
Khashab MA, Yong E, Lennon AM, Shin EJ, Amateau S, Hruban RH, Olino K, Giday S, Fishman EK, Wolfgang CL, Edil BH, Makary M, Canto MI. EUS is still superior to multidetector computerized tomography for detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2011 Apr:73(4):691-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.030. Epub 2010 Nov 10 [PubMed PMID: 21067742]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceWahba A, Tan Z, Dillon JS. Management of functional neuroendocrine tumors. Current problems in cancer. 2024 Oct:52():101130. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101130. Epub 2024 Aug 30 [PubMed PMID: 39213785]
O'Dorisio TM, Mekhjian HS, Gaginella TS. Medical therapy of VIPomas. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America. 1989 Jun:18(2):545-56 [PubMed PMID: 2545444]
Friesen SR. The development of endocrinopathies in the prospective screening of two families with multiple endocrine adenopathy, type I. World journal of surgery. 1979 Nov:3(6):753-64 [PubMed PMID: 43626]
Smith SL, Branton SA, Avino AJ, Martin JK, Klingler PJ, Thompson GB, Grant CS, van Heerden JA. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide secreting islet cell tumors: a 15-year experience and review of the literature. Surgery. 1998 Dec:124(6):1050-5 [PubMed PMID: 9854582]
Fernández-Cruz L, Blanco L, Cosa R, Rendón H. Is laparoscopic resection adequate in patients with neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors? World journal of surgery. 2008 May:32(5):904-17. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9467-2. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18264824]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceAzizian A, König A, Ghadimi M. Treatment options of metastatic and nonmetastatic VIPoma: a review. Langenbeck's archives of surgery. 2022 Nov:407(7):2629-2636. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02620-7. Epub 2022 Aug 5 [PubMed PMID: 35931878]
Brugel M, Walter T, Goichot B, Smith D, Lepage C, Do Cao C, Hautefeuille V, Rebours V, Cadiot G, de Mestier L, Groupe d’Étude des Tumeurs Endocrines (GTE). Efficacy of treatments for VIPoma: A GTE multicentric series. Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]. 2021 Dec:21(8):1531-1539. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 5 [PubMed PMID: 34404601]
Lim C, Lahat E, Osseis M, Sotirov D, Salloum C, Azoulay D. Liver Transplantation for Neuroendocrine Tumors: What Have We Learned? Seminars in liver disease. 2018 Nov:38(4):351-356. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669936. Epub 2018 Oct 24 [PubMed PMID: 30357772]
Moug SJ, Leen E, Horgan PG, Imrie CW. Radiofrequency ablation has a valuable therapeutic role in metastatic VIPoma. Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]. 2006:6(1-2):155-9 [PubMed PMID: 16354964]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceKrug S, Boch M, Daniel H, Nimphius W, Müller D, Michl P, Rinke A, Gress TM. Streptozocin-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms--Predictive and Prognostic Markers for Treatment Stratification. PloS one. 2015:10(12):e0143822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143822. Epub 2015 Dec 2 [PubMed PMID: 26630134]
Raymond E, Dahan L, Raoul JL, Bang YJ, Borbath I, Lombard-Bohas C, Valle J, Metrakos P, Smith D, Vinik A, Chen JS, Hörsch D, Hammel P, Wiedenmann B, Van Cutsem E, Patyna S, Lu DR, Blanckmeister C, Chao R, Ruszniewski P. Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The New England journal of medicine. 2011 Feb 10:364(6):501-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003825. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21306237]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceYao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, Bohas CL, Wolin EM, Van Cutsem E, Hobday TJ, Okusaka T, Capdevila J, de Vries EG, Tomassetti P, Pavel ME, Hoosen S, Haas T, Lincy J, Lebwohl D, Öberg K, RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Third Trial (RADIANT-3) Study Group. Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The New England journal of medicine. 2011 Feb 10:364(6):514-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009290. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21306238]
Level 1 (high-level) evidence