Back To Search Results

EMS Zones of Care

Editor: Joseph Roarty Updated: 5/3/2025 8:55:15 PM

Introduction

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) zones of care—Hot, Warm, and Cold—apply to high-risk, dynamic, or tactical incidents involving an ongoing or potential threat. Examples of such incidents include the following:

  • Active shooter incidents: Ongoing or recent gunfire with multiple casualties requiring rapid evacuation and hemorrhage control
  • Terrorist attacks: Bombings, mass stabbings, or chemical attacks, where the threat may still be active
  • Hostage situations: Prolonged incidents where law enforcement is securing areas, and medical care must be staged
  • Explosions or structural collapses: Scenes with secondary hazards such as fire, gas leaks, or unstable structures
  • Riots and civil unrest: Scenarios requiring responders to work around violent crowds or volatile conditions.
  • Hazardous materials (HAZMAT) incidents: Chemical, biological, or radiological exposures requiring decontamination zones
  • Mass casualty incidents (MCIs): Large-scale events such as bus crashes, train derailments, or plane crashes in dangerous environments

In the prehospital setting, "zones of care" refer to designated areas defined by varying levels of medical capability and threat exposure. These zones guide the deployment of personnel, equipment, and interventions appropriate to the nature of the incident. Although naming conventions differ among agencies, standardized terminology supports effective interprofessional coordination.

The National Incident Management System (NIMS) classifies disaster scenes into Hot, Warm, and Cold zones, each reflecting the relative threat level.[1] Zone designation is based on environmental risk and tactical considerations. The Hot Zone involves immediate danger, where only life-saving interventions—primarily hemorrhage control—are provided. The Warm Zone carries a potential but reduced threat, permitting the delivery of more advanced medical care. The Cold Zone is secure, allowing for full EMS treatment and patient transport.

Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC), first developed in the early 1990s, introduced evidence-based guidelines for managing trauma in battlefield conditions.[2] From 2001 to 2015, combat experience in Iraq and Afghanistan significantly shaped TCCC protocols.[3][4][5][6] In 2010, the Committee for Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) convened to adapt TCCC principles for civilian use. The resulting TECC guidelines, first published in 2011, define 3 dynamic phases of care: Direct Threat Care, Indirect Threat Care, and Evacuation Care. These phases align with the National Incident Management System Hot, Warm, and Cold zones, as outlined in the table below (see Table 1. National Incident Management System Incident Zones and Their Corresponding Tactical Emergency Casualty Care Phases).

Table 1. National Incident Management System Incident Zones and Their Corresponding Tactical Emergency Casualty Care Phases

National Incident Management System Incident Scene Terminology Threat Level Present Tactical Emergency Casualty Care Phase
Hot Zone Active or immediate threat to patients and providers Direct Threat Care
Warm Zone Ongoing risk of injury to patients and providers Indirect Threat Care
Cold Zone Secured area with no present hazard to patients or providers Evacuation Care

Following the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre, national experts gathered in 2013 to improve survival during mass casualty shootings. This initiative led to the Hartford Consensus, a strategic framework spearheaded by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma.[7] The original Hartford Consensus document introduced the acronym THREAT, emphasizing coordinated action through training, policy development, and public education. This acronym is defined as follows:

  • Threat suppression
  • Hemorrhage control
  • Rapid extraction to safety
  • Assessment by medical providers
  • Transport to definitive care [8][9][10]

Zones of care are defined based on various factors, including the nature of the emergency, the presence of HAZMAT compounds, and whether weapons of mass destruction are involved. Each of the 3 primary zones—Hot (Red), Warm (Yellow), and Cold (Green)—has specific characteristics and treatment protocols. Tactical care guidelines used by many local, state, and national EMS units are largely based on recommendations from TECC. The following sections describe EMS interventions based on the zone of care.

Issues of Concern

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Issues of Concern

Hot Zone 

The Hot Zone (Red Zone) represents the most dangerous area in a disaster or tactical incident, where active threats, such as gunfire, explosives, or HAZMAT agents, are present. The primary focus in this zone is threat suppression, preventing additional casualties, evacuating the wounded to safer areas, and controlling life-threatening hemorrhage. Due to the high risk posed to both responders and patients, only minimal medical intervention is allowed, prioritizing rapid extraction and hemorrhage control to prevent further injury. Life-threatening extremity hemorrhage is the sole medical intervention conducted in the Hot Zone. In many cases, only law enforcement or specialized tactical EMS units are permitted to enter, with strict requirements for protective body armor and, at times, firearms.

Acceptable medical treatments in the Hot Zone include immediate hemorrhage control, such as direct pressure and tourniquet application.[11] High mobility is essential for providers, who should carry only critical equipment to enable swift action. If HAZMAT products are involved, responders must wear the highest level of personal protective equipment (PPE), such as Level A suits, with the size of the Hot Zone determined by factors like wind direction, topography, and the type of HAZMAT agents present.[12][13] (Source: Burke, 2021) The primary medical objective in this zone is to quickly move both the patient and provider to a safer area, where more comprehensive care can be administered.[14][15]

Warm Zone

The Warm Zone (Yellow Zone), also known as the Tactical Field Care Zone, serves as a transitional area where the risk is lower than in the Hot Zone but still present. Any operational area with potential risk to patients or providers, yet without an immediate or direct threat, should be classified as a Warm Zone. (Source: Callaway, 2020) The concept of a Rescue Task Force (RTF) is crucial when delivering care in this zone. While care in the Hot Zone is primarily provided by law enforcement and fire personnel, the Rescue Task Force concept involves a 2nd wave of law enforcement escorting civilian EMS into the Warm Zone, reducing EMS response time.[16][17][18]

Although the threat level is reduced, time spent in the Warm Zone should still be limited, as a potential threat remains. Care in this zone should focus on immediate life-saving procedures. Warm Zone Care involves performing critical interventions using the MARCH algorithm while operating in a tactical environment. The MARCH algorithm, used in both TCCC and TECC, prioritizes life-saving interventions in high-risk environments. The acronym stands for:

  • Massive hemorrhage: Controlling life-threatening bleeding
  • Airway: Ensuring an open airway through maneuvers and positioning
  • Respiration: Assessing and treating breathing issues, such as tension pneumothorax
  • Circulation: Managing shock by addressing internal bleeding, monitoring pulse, and administering fluids as needed
  • Hypothermia (and head injury): Preventing hypothermia and recognizing traumatic brain injuries

Table 2 describes acceptable life-saving medical interventions according to the MARCH algorithm (see Table 2. Life-Saving Medical Interventions Based on the MARCH Algorithm).[19]

Table 2. Life-Saving Medical Interventions Based on the MARCH Algorithm

Area of Concern Acceptable Medical Interventions
Massive Hemorrhage
  • Tourniquets
  • Direct pressure
  • Wound packing
  • Pressure dressings
  • Hemostatic dressings
Airway
  • Jaw thrust and chin lift
  • Nasopharyngeal airway placement
  • Recovery position
  • Supraglottic Devices (King LT, LMA, iGel)
  • Orotracheal or nasotracheal intubation
  • Surgical cricothyroidotomy
  • Oxygen
Respirations
  • Vented chest seal placement for open pneumothorax
  • Needle decompression or finger thoracostomy for tension pneumothorax
Circulation
  • Assessment for shock
  • Intravenous access
  • Permissive hypotension resuscitation: >80 mm Hg or >110 mm Hg if suspected or confirmed traumatic brain injury
  • Tranexamic acid administration
Hypothermia
  • Preventing reverse hypothermia
  • Avoiding cutting off clothes or protective gear unless necessary
  • Keeping the patient covered, warm, and dry
  • Warming fluids are preferred if fluids are administered intravenously
Head Injury
  • Assessing neurological status
  • Ensuring adequate oxygenation
  • Assisting ventilation if necessary
  • Maintaining systolic blood pressure >110 mm Hg
  • Elevating the head 30° if possible
  • Immobilizing the spine as indicated

Management of non-life-threatening injuries should be deferred. Rapid establishment of a casualty collection point (CCP) in the Warm Zone is essential, providing a centralized location for casualties evacuated from the Hot Zone who require further medical treatment.

The primary focus in the Warm Zone is the continued treatment of life-threatening injuries and the establishment of a CCP. A rapid and efficient CCP is essential for triaging casualties evacuated from the Hot Zone who require further medical treatment.

Acceptable medical treatments in the Warm Zone include the application of additional tourniquets or hemostatic agents, along with a quick reassessment of the patient for any unrecognized or untreated hemorrhage. Any tourniquets already in place should be reassessed for effectiveness and adjusted or reinforced with additional tourniquets as necessary. Other hemorrhage control options include wound packing with a pressure bandage or hemostatic gauze with direct pressure.

Airway management in the Warm Zone involves basic maneuvers such as chin lifts and the insertion of nasopharyngeal airways. In cases of severe airway compromise, a cricothyroidotomy is preferred over intubation due to its speed and effectiveness in tactical settings.[20] For tension pneumothorax, needle decompression should be performed with frequent reassessments to ensure effectiveness.[21]

For open chest wounds (open pneumothorax), chest seals should be placed, with vented chest seals recommended over unvented ones based on evidence from animal models and updated international guidelines.[22] Any chest seal placed must be monitored frequently for the development of a tension pneumothorax, with appropriate treatment provided.[23] Additional measures to prevent and treat hypothermia and shock, such as rewarming techniques and administering intravenous fluids, may also be appropriate during Warm Zone care.

The treatment of non-life-threatening bleeding or injuries, such as fractures or moderate burns, should be deferred to the Cold Zone. These non-life-threatening injuries do not require immediate care in the Warm Zone.

The Warm Zone remains fluid, requiring constant awareness of the evolving threat environment. Due to the dynamic nature of this zone, medical procedures should be performed quickly, with the understanding that evacuation to the Cold Zone may be necessary at any moment. Formal triage does not occur in this zone. Ambulatory patients should bypass the Warm Zone and go directly to the Cold Zone. If HAZMAT substances are involved, additional personal protective equipment may be required to ensure responder safety during medical interventions and decontamination procedures.

Cold Zone

The Cold Zone (Green Zone), also known as the Casualty Evacuation Zone, is the safest area where comprehensive medical care can be provided without immediate threats to providers or patients. Establishing a treatment area in the Cold Zone is essential for effectively managing patient care. This zone serves as the location for 2 main patient populations: ambulatory patients who self-extricated from the Hot Zone, and nonambulatory patients who were treated in and evacuated from Warm Zone CCPs.

Formal triage is critical in the Cold Zone to ensure both ambulatory and nonambulatory patients receive appropriate care. Ambulatory patients may have unrecognized life-threatening injuries, while nonambulatory patients require thorough evaluation and reassessment of prior interventions, as care in the Hot and Warm Zones may have been provided under duress. In the Cold Zone, standard EMS teams deliver care according to established local, regional, or state protocols. Timely evacuation to local medical facilities is essential, with the highest-priority patients transported to the most suitable nearby facility.

In mass casualty incidents, transporting lower-acuity patients to facilities farther away may be more appropriate to prevent overwhelming the closest medical centers. Patient tracking must be coordinated across the entire medical system, including hospitals, fire services, and EMS, to facilitate family reunification. Hospitals must collaborate with first responder services, especially since some patients may arrive by private transport, and technologies such as barcode scanners and facial recognition should be utilized to maintain accurate records and streamline the process. (Source: Callaway and Burnstein, 2020)

The primary focus in the Cold Zone is the stabilization of patients and preparation for transport. Standard EMS protocols apply, with interventions including full airway management, fluid resuscitation, and wound care as necessary. Although the Cold Zone is generally safe, responders must remain vigilant for any operational hazards that may arise.

A thorough reassessment of all interventions should be conducted in the Cold Zone. Steps include checking the effectiveness of tourniquets, verifying airway management devices, and inspecting decompression catheters for potential blockages. Effective communication during patient transfer is crucial, as transport teams may not be familiar with tactical medicine protocols. Ensuring that all interventions are clearly documented and communicated can help prevent complications during transport and ensure continuity of care.

Clinical Significance

Zones of care are fluid and dynamic, requiring responders to maintain continuous situational awareness and adaptability. Each zone presents distinct risks and demands specific medical and safety protocols. Weather, environmental factors, and the evolving nature of the emergency can alter zone boundaries in real-time, adding complexity to care delivery.

In high-threat rescue missions, the core principle is to deploy a minimal number of personnel into the Hot Zone to evacuate the wounded to the Warm Zone for stabilization swiftly. Subsequently, casualties should be rapidly transported to the Cold Zone for definitive care and further evacuation. The ultimate goal is to transition patients from high-risk areas to definitive care as safely and efficiently as possible, ensuring the safety of both providers and patients throughout the process.

References


[1]

Pennardt A, Schwartz RB. Hot, warm, and cold zones: applying existing national incident management system terminology to enhance tactical emergency medical support interoperability. Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2014 Fall:14(3):78-79. doi: 10.55460/ONF2-WPXE. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25344711]


[2]

Butler FK Jr. Tactical Combat Casualty Care: Beginnings. Wilderness & environmental medicine. 2017 Jun:28(2S):S12-S17. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Mar 9     [PubMed PMID: 28284483]


[3]

Eastridge BJ, Costanzo G, Jenkins D, Spott MA, Wade C, Greydanus D, Flaherty S, Rappold J, Dunne J, Holcomb JB, Blackbourne LH. Impact of joint theater trauma system initiatives on battlefield injury outcomes. American journal of surgery. 2009 Dec:198(6):852-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.029. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19969141]


[4]

Kelly JF, Ritenour AE, McLaughlin DF, Bagg KA, Apodaca AN, Mallak CT, Pearse L, Lawnick MM, Champion HR, Wade CE, Holcomb JB. Injury severity and causes of death from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom: 2003-2004 versus 2006. The Journal of trauma. 2008 Feb:64(2 Suppl):S21-6; discussion S26-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318160b9fb. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18376168]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[5]

Battlefield trauma care then and now: a decade of Tactical Combat Casualty Care., Butler FK Jr,Blackbourne LH,, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2012 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 23192061]


[6]

Montgomery HR, Drew B. Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Update. Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2020 Summer:20(2):152-153. doi: 10.55460/8BYB-KQQG. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32573756]


[7]

Callaway DW. Translating Tactical Combat Casualty Care Lessons Learned to the High-Threat Civilian Setting: Tactical Emergency Casualty Care and the Hartford Consensus. Wilderness & environmental medicine. 2017 Jun:28(2S):S140-S145. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2016.11.008. Epub 2017 Apr 6     [PubMed PMID: 28392170]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Jacobs LM, McSwain NE Jr, Rotondo MF, Wade D, Fabbri W, Eastman AL, Butler FK Jr, Sinclair J, Joint Committee to Create a National Policy to Enhance Survivability from Mass Casualty Shooting Events. Improving survival from active shooter events: the Hartford Consensus. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2013 Jun:74(6):1399-400. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318296b237. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23694864]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[9]

Jacobs LM, Wade DS, McSwain NE, Butler FK, Fabbri WP, Eastman AL, Rotondo M, Sinclair J, Burns KJ. The Hartford Consensus: THREAT, a medical disaster preparedness concept. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2013 Nov:217(5):947-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.002. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24139220]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[10]

Jacobs LM, Wade D, McSwain NE, Butler FK, Fabbri W, Eastman A, Conn A, Burns KJ. Hartford Consensus: a call to action for THREAT, a medical disaster preparedness concept. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2014 Mar:218(3):467-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.009. Epub 2013 Dec 14     [PubMed PMID: 24559957]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[11]

Montgomery HR, Hammesfahr R, Fisher AD, Cain JS, Greydanus DJ, Butler FK Jr, Goolsby C, Eastman AL. 2019 Recommended Limb Tourniquets in Tactical Combat Casualty Care. Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2019 Winter:19(4):27-50. doi: 10.55460/HQDV-7SXN. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31910470]


[12]

Plante DM, Walker JS. EMS response at a hazardous material incident: some basic guidelines. The Journal of emergency medicine. 1989 Jan-Feb:7(1):55-64     [PubMed PMID: 2649554]


[13]

Byers M, Russell M, Lockey DJ. Clinical care in the "Hot Zone". Emergency medicine journal : EMJ. 2008 Feb:25(2):108-12. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.037689. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18212153]


[14]

Miles J, Crook C. Evolution of hot zone care: MARA. BMJ military health. 2021 Jun:167(3):206-208. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001433. Epub 2020 Apr 26     [PubMed PMID: 32341016]


[15]

Serino P. READY FOR THE HEAT: Training Inside the Hot Zone. EMS world. 2016 Oct:45(10):76-80     [PubMed PMID: 29953760]


[16]

Chovaz M, Patel RV, March JA, Taylor SE, Brewer KL. Willingness of Emergency Medical Services Professionals to Respond to an Active Shooter Incident. Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2018 Winter:18(4):82-86. doi: 10.55460/RQN5-WWBY. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30566728]


[17]

[Extraction technic for mandibular wisdom teeth by the vestibular or external route]., Guillemin JF,, Revue d'odonto-stomatologie, 1977 Jul-Aug     [PubMed PMID: 25291188]


[18]

Weinman S. Prehospital Medical Response to Active Shooter Incidents-The Rescue Task Force Concept. Journal of emergency nursing. 2020 May:46(3):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2020.02.004. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32389214]


[19]

Callaway DW, Smith ER, Cain JS, Shapiro G, Burnett WT, McKay SD, Mabry RL. Tactical emergency casualty care (TECC): guidelines for the provision of prehospital trauma care in high threat environments. Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2011 Summer-Fall:11(3):104-122. doi: 10.55460/8BUM-KREB. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22173602]


[20]

Dye C, Keenan S, Carius BM, Loos PE, Remley MA, Mendes B, Arnold JL, May I, Powell D, Tobin JM, Riesberg JC, Shackelford SA. Airway Management in Prolonged Field Care. Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2020 Fall:20(3):141-156. doi: 10.55460/BAF7-3BM3. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32969020]


[21]

Butler FK Jr, Holcomb JB, Shackelford SA, Montgomery HR, Anderson S, Cain JS, Champion HR, Cunningham CW, Dorlac WC, Drew B, Edwards K, Gandy JV, Glassberg E, Gurney JM, Harcke T, Jenkins DA, Johannigman J, Kheirabadi BS, Kotwal RS, Littlejohn LF, Martin MJ, Mazuchowski EL, Otten EJ, Polk T, Rhee P, Seery JM, Stockinger Z, Torrisi J, Yitzak A, Zafren K, Zietlow SP. Management of Suspected Tension Pneumothorax in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: TCCC Guidelines Change 17-02. Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2018 Summer:18(2):19-35. doi: 10.55460/XB1Z-3BJU. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29889952]


[22]

Kuhlwilm V. The Use of Chest Seals in Treating Sucking Chest Wounds: A Comparison of Existing Evidence and Guideline Recommendations. Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2021 Spring:21(1):94-101. doi: 10.55460/3G6H-14FD. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 33721314]


[23]

Butler FK Jr, DuBose JJ, Otten EJ, Bennett DR, Gerhardt RT, Kheirabadi BS, Gross K, Cap AP, Littlejohn LF, Edgar EP, Shackelford SA, Blackbourne LH, Kotwal RS, Holcomb JB, Bailey JA. Management of Open Pneumothorax in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: TCCC Guidelines Change 13-02. Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2013 Fall:13(3):81-86. doi: 10.55460/739G-PP0W. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24048995]