Back To Search Results

Wound Grafts

Editor: Omar Nunez Lopez Updated: 2/15/2025 4:54:23 PM

Introduction

Nonhealing wounds affect millions of people annually in the United States and approximately 1% of the global population, significantly impacting the quality of life and healthcare resources. With an aging population, the prevalence of chronic wounds is expected to rise worldwide. Loss of skin integrity due to infection, burns, or trauma leads to substantial morbidity and mortality, with burns alone causing around 180,000 deaths globally each year. Wound coverage is crucial to minimize fluid loss, prevent infection, and alleviate pain. Skin grafting is vital in restoring tissue continuity for patients with burns, trauma, or chronic wounds. Key outcomes include graft survival, mechanical function, sensory restoration, cosmetic appearance, and overall patient satisfaction.[1]

Skin grafting has evolved to treat surgical defects and chronic wounds, including venous and diabetic ulcers that fail to heal over several months. By covering wounds, grafting reduces infection risk and creates a moist, vascularized environment conducive to healing.[2] Key principles in skin grafting include thorough debridement of nonviable tissue and adequate coverage of exposed areas.[3] Various graft types and techniques are available, primarily autografts, allografts, and xenografts. Autografts are harvested from the patient, allografts come from cadaveric donors, and xenografts are derived from animal tissue.[1]

Porcine xenografts are commonly used for temporary wound coverage, though they do not revascularize.[1] Allografts, obtained from cadaveric skin, serve as temporary biological dressings, particularly for patients requiring resuscitation and debridement before autografting. These grafts stabilize patients without additional donor sites but pose disease transmission, rejection, and limited availability risks.[4] Recently, allografts have been explored as permanent grafting options due to their ability to undergo revascularization.[5][6]

Autografts, taken from the patient's skin, eliminate antigenic compatibility concerns and preserve native skin elements. These grafts are typically placed after extensive wound debridement to ensure an optimal wound bed.[7][8] Because they are completely separated from their donor site, autografts rely on capillary ingrowth for survival. Full-thickness autografts include both the epidermis and dermis, whereas split-thickness grafts contain only a portion of the dermis. Split-thickness grafts are ideal for poorly perfused areas, such as joints and nerves, due to their lower vascular requirements, while full-thickness grafts need a robust blood supply. Split-thickness grafts can also cover larger areas and allow for repeated harvesting from the donor site.[3]

For patients with extensive skin loss, autograft harvesting may not be feasible due to insufficient donor tissue.[6] In such cases, alternative grafts are necessary. Composite grafts incorporate additional tissues like cartilage, providing deeper coverage for complex wounds. Bioengineered skin substitutes function as synthetic skin equivalents and are available in multiple formats, including split-thickness, full-thickness, autologous engineered material, and acellular dermal grafts. Options such as acellular dermal allografts and allografts treated with antibiotic ointments expand treatment possibilities.[1] However, most bioengineered skin substitutes provide dermal or epidermal coverage but lack the elasticity and strength of native skin. Dermal substitutes rely on epidermal ingrowth to complete wound closure.[3]

One of the most commonly used skin substitutes is the cultured epidermal autograft. This process involves taking a full-thickness skin biopsy from the patient, isolating keratinocytes, and expanding them into a neoepidermis. However, these grafts remain fragile, are prone to shear injuries, and require extended periods of immobility for successful integration.[9][10] Dermal substitutes comprise a matrix of glycosaminoglycans and collagen and provide good cosmetic outcomes, but their high-cost limits widespread use.[10][11]

Recent innovations in skin grafting include techniques that use dermal-epidermal junction biopsies to generate keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and melanocytes, which are then sprayed onto the wound. Another emerging product is a bilayer structure made from bovine collagen and glycosaminoglycans supported by a silicone sheet. This temporary epidermal substitute degrades as neovascularization occurs, allowing an autologous collagen matrix to replace it. Once the wound bed contracts, the silicone layer is removed, and a split-thickness graft is applied.[12] While promising, many advanced products are costly and require further research to optimize their efficacy and accessibility.[10]

Anatomy and Physiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Anatomy and Physiology

Wound grafts are crucial in managing large, deep, or nonhealing wounds. They provide coverage and promote healing by restoring skin integrity and underlying tissues. Understanding the anatomy and physiology of wound grafts is essential for selecting the appropriate type of graft and optimizing outcomes.

Anatomy of Wound Grafts

The skin is composed of 2 primary layers: the epidermis and the dermis. The epidermis acts as a barrier to environmental factors, while the dermis provides structural support and houses blood vessels, nerve endings, hair follicles, and connective tissues. Grafts vary in thickness, depending on whether they include only the epidermis, part of the dermis, or both layers.

  • Epidermal grafts
    • These grafts involve only the epidermis and are used when the dermis is intact. They focus on superficial coverage. However, they lack a blood supply and generally do not grow or thrive independently.
  • Partial-thickness grafts
    • These include the epidermis and a portion of the dermis. They contain vascular structures that temporarily support the graft and allow for revascularization over time.
  • Full-thickness grafts
    • These grafts involve the epidermis and the entire dermal layer, completely replacing lost tissue, including skin appendages like hair follicles and sweat glands, which can contribute to functional recovery in the grafted area.

Graft Materials

The source of graft material determines its characteristics and suitability for specific wounds.

  • Autografts
    • Skin is taken from the patient's own body, making them antigenically compatible and reducing the risk of rejection. Autografts can be full-thickness or split-thickness and are commonly used for burn victims or trauma patients.
  • Allografts
    • Skin is obtained from a cadaver or organ donor. These are used for acute management of large wounds or burns but are typically temporary due to the risk of immune rejection and infection.
  • Xenografts
    • Skin from nonhuman animals, typically pigs, is a temporary covering to promote healing. Like allografts, xenografts are used short-term and do not permanently integrate with the recipient’s tissue.
  • Dermal substitutes and bioengineered grafts
    • These synthetic or bioengineered materials aim to mimic the structure and function of natural skin. They may include collagen, extracellular matrix components, or cultured cells and are used in cases where autografting is not feasible or for large wounds.

Physiology of Wound Grafts

The physiology behind wound grafts focuses on their ability to integrate with the recipient's tissue and restore skin function. Key processes involved in graft survival and integration include:

  • Revascularization
    • For a graft to survive, it must develop a blood supply. Initially, the graft relies on passive diffusion for nutrients and oxygen. Over time, blood vessels from the wound bed begin to grow into the graft, a process called revascularization. This is especially crucial for full-thickness grafts requiring more substantial vascular support than partial-thickness grafts.
  • Incorporation and adherence
    • The graft must adhere securely to the wound bed to prevent displacement and facilitate healing. Initially, fibrin and other proteins fix the graft, but as revascularization occurs, the graft establishes a stronger, permanent bond with the wound bed.
  • Epithelialization
    • The new epithelial cells from the wound bed grow over the graft in a process called epithelialization. This is essential for functionalizing the graft and restoring the skin’s protective barrier.
  • Collagen synthesis and remodeling
    • After graft placement, fibroblasts from the wound bed infiltrate the graft and begin synthesizing collagen, which provides strength and elasticity to the new skin. Over time, this collagen is remodeled, and the tissue becomes more functional, although grafted tissue may never be as strong or elastic as the original skin.
  • Immune response and rejection
    • The primary concern with allografts and xenografts is immune rejection. The immune system may recognize foreign tissue as a threat, initiating an inflammatory response. Autografts are immune-compatible because they come from the patient’s body, thus eliminating the risk of rejection. However, infection and immune response must be closely monitored with nonautologous grafts.
  • Cosmesis and functionality
    • Grafts aim to restore the skin's functional and cosmetic qualities in addition to physical healing. Full-thickness grafts are more likely to restore some of the skin’s original texture and appearance, including appendages like hair follicles and sweat glands. Partial-thickness grafts, while less functional in this regard, are often used when aesthetics are less critical.

Wound Healing Process with Grafts

Skin is an essential barrier to infection and moderates thermoregulation and metabolic function. The destruction of the skin impedes regenerative capacity and predisposes the body to systemic decompensation. Skin grafts regenerate growth factors and essential proteins for wound repair, including those that promote keratinocyte growth. Grafting facilitates granulation, matrix remodeling, and collagen deposition to restore skin functionality.[6]

Once a skin graft is in place, fibrin connections promote adherence within about 8 hours. Close contact of the graft to the wound bed allows immune mediators and fibroblasts to migrate into the fibrin network, further connecting the graft to the wound. Nutrients and oxygen are absorbed from the underlying wound. Neovascularization occurs as capillaries from the wound bed network with the graft. Following revascularization, myofibroblasts contract the wound, and angiogenesis and lymphogenesis proceed. Depending on the graft's properties, dermal elements may regenerate in the grafted area.[13] 

In summary, wound grafts play an essential role in wound healing by restoring the skin's structural and functional integrity. The regenerative processes of revascularization, fibroblast migration, collagen synthesis, and graft integration contribute to wound healing. The choice of graft material and its integration into the wound bed depends on the type and extent of the wound, with full-thickness grafts providing the most complete functional recovery due to the inclusion of skin appendages.

Indications

Skin grafts are indicated in various clinical situations, particularly in managing large, deep, or nonhealing wounds that cannot heal by primary intention. The primary goal of skin grafting is to restore the skin's protective barrier, promote healing, and improve cosmetic and functional outcomes. Some common indications for skin grafts include:

  • Thermal injuries
    • One of the most common indications for skin grafts is second- and third-degree burns. Full-thickness burns that destroy the epidermis and dermis typically require skin grafts to promote healing and minimize scarring and functional impairment. Autografts are often preferred, but allografts or xenografts may be used temporarily.
    • Beyond burns, thermal injuries like electric burns, scalding, and severe frostbite can cause extensive skin damage and tissue death, necessitating grafting after the necrotic tissue has been removed.
  • Traumatic wounds
    • Severe lacerations, avulsions, and other traumatic injuries that result in significant skin loss may require skin grafts for wound closure and to restore the integrity of the skin.
  • Chronic nonhealing ulcers
    • Chronic ulcers, such as those seen in diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers, or venous stasis ulcers, may not heal with conservative treatments. Skin grafts can promote closure and healing, especially when significant tissue is lost.
  • Infected or necrotic tissue
    • In cases where infection or necrosis has caused tissue death, skin grafts can be used after debridement to cover the wound and promote further healing, reducing the risk of infection and systemic complications. 
    • Those undergoing extensive debridement for necrotizing infections often benefit from skin grafting to cover the wound and promote healing.[14]
  • Skin cancer resections
    • Surgical removal of skin cancers, such as melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, or squamous cell carcinoma, often results in large defects that may require grafts to cover the area and restore both function and appearance.
  • Congenital defects
    • Skin grafts can cover congenital skin defects or deformities, such as in the case of certain genetic conditions like epidermolysis bullosa, where the skin is fragile and prone to blistering and wounds.
  • Cosmetic reconstruction
    • In some cases, skin grafts are used for cosmetic or reconstructive purposes, such as postsurgical aesthetic procedures, to improve the appearance of skin following trauma, burns, or previous skin grafting.
  • Scar revision
    • Sometimes, skin grafts may be used to revise unsightly or functional scars, especially in areas where full-thickness skin loss has caused significant deformities.

Skin grafting is particularly useful for deep partial-thickness and full-thickness burns, traumatic wounds that leave sizeable skin defects, and nonhealing or large wounds that do not close via primary or secondary intention. The choice of graft material (autograft, allograft, xenograft, or synthetic dermal substitute) depends on the size and depth of the wound, the location, the patient's overall health, and the availability of suitable donor tissue. Full-thickness grafts are generally preferred for areas that require both form and function restoration, while split-thickness grafts are used for larger surface areas or less functional zones.

Contraindications

Before proceeding with the procedure, several possible contraindications to skin grafting should be considered. These include:

  • Active infection
    • Skin grafting is contraindicated in areas with active infection, as the presence of bacteria or other pathogens can impair graft take and integration. Infection can also spread deeper into tissues, leading to systemic complications, ie, sepsis. Any systemic or local infection must be controlled and resolved before grafting is considered.[6]
  • Poor vascularity
    • The success of a skin graft depends on its ability to revascularize through the underlying wound bed. The graft may fail to survive if the wound bed lacks adequate blood supply, such as in severe peripheral vascular disease. Adequate circulation is essential for graft survival, and areas with poor perfusion are generally unsuitable for grafting.
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
    • Conditions such as poorly controlled diabetes, autoimmune diseases (eg, lupus or rheumatoid arthritis), or other systemic illnesses that impair healing or compromise immune function may be contraindications to grafting. These conditions can interfere with the graft’s ability to take and heal properly, increasing the risk of complications like infection or graft rejection.
  • Insufficient donor tissue
    • Autografting relies on the availability of healthy donor skin from the patient. In cases where insufficient skin remains for harvesting, such as in patients with extensive burns or trauma, autografts may not be feasible. In such cases, alternative options like allografts or xenografts may be used temporarily, but they do not provide the same long-term benefits as autografts.
  • Inadequate wound bed preparation
    • Skin grafting requires properly preparing the wound bed to promote graft adherence and healing. Wounds with necrotic tissue, excessive exudate, or poor hygiene should be debrided and cleaned before grafting. If the wound bed is not adequately prepared and lacks substantive tissue scaffolding, the graft may not adhere properly or fail to revascularize.[6]
  • Severe psychological stress or noncompliance
    • Patients who are unable to follow postoperative care instructions or who are at high risk of psychological stress may not be suitable candidates for skin grafting. The success of grafting often requires patient cooperation, especially in managing wound care, avoiding trauma to the graft site, and following follow-up protocols.
  • Untreated malignancy
    • If a malignancy causes the wound or if there is concern about underlying undiagnosed cancer, grafting is contraindicated until the cancer is adequately addressed. Grafting over a malignancy may impair the ability to assess and treat the cancer properly and could facilitate tumor spread.
  • Poor nutritional status
    • Malnutrition or significant weight loss can impair the body’s ability to heal. Grafting requires sufficient protein and nutrient availability for collagen synthesis and tissue repair. Patients with poor nutritional status may be at a higher risk for graft failure and poor wound healing.
  • Recent radiotherapy
    • Patients who have recently received radiation therapy in the area of grafting may have impaired tissue regeneration due to radiation-induced damage to the vasculature and connective tissue. This may reduce the likelihood of graft survival and integration.
  • Smoking
    • Smoking is a significant risk factor for graft failure. Nicotine and other substances in tobacco can impair circulation and reduce the body’s ability to deliver oxygen and nutrients to healing tissues. Smoking cessation before and after grafting is crucial to improving the chances of graft success.
  • Severe anemia
    • A low red blood cell count can impair tissue oxygen delivery, including to grafts. Severe anemia may reduce the likelihood of successful graft integration and healing, and blood transfusions may be necessary before grafting.
  • Medicolegal issues
    • Medicolegal issues in skin grafting primarily involve ensuring informed consent, adhering to the standard of care, accurately documenting the procedure, and respecting patient rights.
    • Healthcare providers must fully inform patients about the risks, benefits, and alternatives to skin grafting and ensure that consent is properly documented.
    • Maintaining high standards in technique, wound bed preparation, and postoperative care is essential to avoiding liability for complications such as infection, graft failure, or unsatisfactory cosmetic results. Potential immune rejection must also be considered in cases of nonautografts.
    • Thorough documentation of the procedure and follow-up is crucial in defending against claims of negligence or malpractice. Proper risk management practices, such as addressing contraindications and providing adequate patient education, help mitigate medicolegal risks.[6]

Equipment

The equipment needed for skin grafting involves tools for both graft harvesting and graft preparation and placement onto the recipient site.[15][16] The following is a breakdown of the key equipment:

  • Graft Harvesting Tools
    • Dermatome
      • This is a specialized surgical instrument used to harvest skin for grafting. This device allows for precise, controlled removal of a thin layer of skin (split-thickness graft). There are both manual and powered versions of the dermatome.
    • Mineral Oil
      • This is placed on the donor site skin to help the dermatome move easily over the skin as it is harvested.
    • Cutting blade or knife
      • Used for harvesting full-thickness grafts or assisting in the wound bed's debridement if necessary.
    • Graft mesher
      • This device stretches a split-thickness graft by poking holes in it, thereby increasing its surface area for better coverage of larger wounds while preserving vascularity.
    • Scissors
      • Surgical scissors are essential for trimming and shaping the graft to fit the recipient site.
    • Sterile gloves, gowns, and masks
      • These are necessary for maintaining a sterile environment to prevent infections during graft harvesting and placement.
  • Recipient Site Preparation
    • Scalpel
      • Used for debridement of nonviable tissue and shaping the recipient site.
    • Surgical sponges and drapes
      • These are used to clean the area, provide a sterile field, and absorb blood or fluids during the procedure.
    • Sutures/staples
      • Typically, sutures (either absorbable or nonabsorbable) secure the graft in place. Staples may also be used, though they are less common for securing skin grafts in delicate areas.
    • Tissue forceps
      • These help manipulate and position the graft on the recipient site.
  • Postoperative Care Tools
    • Occlusive dressings
      • Petroleum-impregnated gauze or foam dressings help protect the graft and maintain a moist environment, promoting graft survival and preventing infection.
    • Negative pressure wound therapy devices
      • These provide a controlled vacuum that promotes graft adherence and wound healing.
    • Compression garments
      • Compression garments reduce scarring and help with graft adherence for postoperative care of graft sites, particularly in burn patients.
  • Monitoring Equipment
    • Vital sign monitors
      • These are used to ensure the patient’s general stability during the procedure and to detect any complications, such as circulatory issues, that may affect graft survival.

Proper preparation and sterilization of these tools, along with a controlled and sterile surgical environment, are crucial to the success of skin grafting procedures. Each piece of equipment is vital in ensuring graft survival and minimizing the risk of complications such as infection, graft rejection, and poor cosmetic outcomes.

Preparation

Patient and wound preparation are essential steps in ensuring the success of skin grafting, minimizing complications, and optimizing healing. This process includes preoperative assessment, wound debridement, and proper graft preparation for autologous and allograft procedures.

Preoperative Patient Preparation

  • Medical assessment
    • The patient’s comorbid conditions, such as diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, or immunocompromised states, should be evaluated. These conditions can significantly impact wound healing and graft survival. Glycemic control is crucial in diabetic patients, and malnutrition should be addressed to optimize healing. The patient’s medication list should also be reviewed, particularly for anticoagulants or immunosuppressants that could impair clotting and graft viability.
  • Infection control
    • Before grafting, underlying infections must be controlled. This may involve using systemic antibiotics and topical agents to prepare the wound bed.
  • Anesthesia assessment
    • A thorough anesthesia evaluation is needed, and appropriate plans for local, regional, or general anesthesia based on the extent of the procedure are required.
  • Psychosocial considerations
    • Discussing expectations with the patient and family, especially for patients with burns or significant cosmetic concerns, is important. Providing emotional and psychological support can help with the recovery process.

Wound Preparation

  • Debridement
    • Proper debridement is critical for removing necrotic tissue, foreign bodies, and other nonviable material that could impair graft adherence and healing. This is often done via sharp excision, curettage, or enzymatic debridement. Early excision of necrotic tissue reduces the risk of infection and allows for faster rehabilitation, while careful removal of eschar minimizes scarring and contractures.[17][18]
      • Eschar removal
        • Eschar is excised until healthy tissue is reached. Tangential excision, which involves removing thin layers of tissue, is often used for burn wounds. Excision through fascial planes can speed up the process but may result in poorer cosmetic outcomes. Debriding and grafting wounds over joints is especially important to prevent excessive contracture.[19][20]
      • Granulation tissue management
        • Fibrous or contaminated granulation tissue should be excised, as it can harbor bacteria and hinder graft take. The outer layer of granulation tissue can be gently removed using a diathermy scratch pad or scalpel.
      • Hemostasis
        • Achieving hemostasis is essential for graft success and can be done with electrocautery or topical hemostatic agents. This prevents excessive bleeding and ensures the graft adheres well to the wound bed.[2]
  • Wound bed preparation
    • The wound bed must be infection-free, and the tissue should be healthy and well-vascularized to receive the graft. Contaminated or fibrous tissue must be removed to enhance graft adherence.

Graft Preparation

  • Autologous graft harvesting
    • The traditional donor site is the thigh for autologous grafts, but other areas, such as the inner upper arm, medial thigh, or abdomen, can also be used. These sites are selected to allow for primary closure of the donor site. The graft is harvested in parallel to the skin to avoid damaging the underlying adipose tissue, and the harvested skin is then prepared for transplantation.[3]
  • Allograft procurement and safety
    • When using allografts, it is crucial to ensure the safety and viability of the donor skin. The donor team must follow strict skin selection, harvesting, and preservation protocols.[6] Allografts are typically used as temporary coverings and do not permanently integrate into the recipient’s tissue.

Intraoperative Considerations

  • Sterilization and anesthesia
    • The recipient and donor sites should be thoroughly sterilized with an antiseptic solution such as povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine. The anesthesia team must ensure that the patient is appropriately anesthetized locally, regionally, or under general anesthesia.
  • Graft adherence
    • Once the graft is placed, it should be held in position, often using sutures or staples. The graft should remain in close contact with the wound bed for at least 8 hours, promoting initial fibrin connections and early revascularization.

Postoperative Care

  • Immobilization and dressing
    • The grafted area should be immobilized using compression dressings or splints to minimize movement and shear forces that could disrupt graft adherence. The wound should also be kept moist to facilitate cell migration and graft survival.
  • Pain management
    • Both the recipient and donor sites can be painful postoperatively. Adequate analgesia, including narcotics or local anesthetics, should be provided to manage pain.
  • Infection monitoring
    • Postoperative monitoring for infection, graft failure, or poor adherence is crucial. Signs such as increased pain, swelling, erythema, or discharge should be promptly addressed.
  • Nutrition and support
    • Nutritional support may be required to promote healing, especially for patients with extensive wounds. Physical therapy may also be necessary to prevent contractures and optimize mobility, particularly for burn patients.

In conclusion, successful skin grafting requires thorough patient evaluation, meticulous wound preparation, proper graft harvesting techniques, and careful postoperative care. Whether using autologous, allograft, or synthetic materials, these steps ensure the graft integrates with the recipient tissue, facilitates healing, and restores skin function.

Technique or Treatment

Full-Thickness Skin Grafts

Full-thickness skin grafts consist of both the epidermis and dermis. The selection of the donor site is based on the anatomical characteristics of the wound, ensuring optimal closure and pain control at the donor site.[4][21] Common donor sites include the flank, groin, hypothenar eminence, pre and postauricular areas, forearm, and upper arm. The donor site and recipient wound are first prepped, draped, and anesthetized. The dimensions of the donor graft are carefully measured to correspond to the wound, depending on the clinician’s practice.

Once the donor site is sharply excised, any excess adipose tissue is meticulously removed from the underside of the graft to enhance adherence to the wound bed. The graft is then placed onto the recipient site, ensuring complete approximation, and secured using sutures or staples. To promote graft adherence and revascularization, a moisture-laden pressure dressing and a bolster are applied, exerting gentle pressure across the entire grafted area. The donor site is subsequently either closed primarily or dressed appropriately.[4]

Split-Thickness Skin Grafts

Split-thickness grafts contain the epidermis and a portion of the dermis, allowing a smaller harvested area to cover a much larger wound. These grafts offer the advantage of rapid donor site healing, permitting reharvesting if needed.[22] Split-thickness grafts are typically meshed to maximize coverage, expanding their surface area while allowing fluid to egress through the interstices, thereby enhancing contact between the graft and the wound bed. The most commonly used meshing ratios are 1:1 and 3:1, with larger ratios increasing the risk of poor graft take due to excessive interstice spacing.[21][23][24]

While split-thickness grafts are effective, they present certain drawbacks. Meshing may result in an undesirable scar pattern, and healing is associated with a higher contracture rate. Nonmeshed grafts are preferred for areas greater than 3 cm on the face and hands to minimize contracture and improve cosmesis.[2] The surgical process begins with appropriate site preparation, draping, and anesthesia administration. A dermatome is used to harvest the graft at a controlled thickness, which can be as thin as 0.005 inches; however, the most commonly used thickness ranges between 0.012 and 0.018 inches. The graft thickness is compared against a #10 scalpel blade to ensure accuracy.

The scalpel blade should fit within the dermatome space and become snug as the blade thickensThe dermatome is calibrated before each use to prevent donor site wastage, additional wounds, or insufficient graft material; the donor site is coated with mineral oil before harvesting to reduce resistance. The skin is placed under tension to ensure a flat and even surface. The dermatome is introduced at a 45° angle and advanced smoothly while applying downward pressure. An assistant may provide gentle countertraction to the graft to prevent it from folding or flapping during harvest. Once the desired amount of tissue is obtained, the dermatome is lifted off, effectively amputating the graft from the donor site. If necessary, the graft can be cleanly severed with a scalpel. Hemostasis is achieved at the donor site by applying a pad soaked in a 1:1000 epinephrine and normal saline solution.

If meshing is required, the graft is processed through a mesher at the desired ratio. The graft is then positioned over the wound with the dermis side in direct contact with the wound bed and secured using sutures or staples. A moisture-laden pressure dressing and bolster are applied to optimize graft adherence.[2] Additionally, the donor site is dressed using petroleum gauze and an occlusive bandage.

Postoperative Graft Management

To prevent shear injury and enhance fibrin ingrowed. Shearing forces disrupt neovascularization, leading to graft necrosis and failure. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to be superior to bolstered dressings in securing the graft, as it effectively removes excess fluid while maintaining close contact between the graft and the wound bed. However, NPWT may not always be logistically feasible in all settings, necessitating traditional bolster dressings as an alternative.[25][26]

Complications

Skin grafting, while a fundamental reconstructive technique, carries several potential complications affecting both the graft and donor sites. These complications can be categorized based on timing (early vs late) and underlying pathophysiology (ischemic, infectious, or mechanical failure).

Early Complications

  • Graft failure 
    • The success of a skin graft depends on plasmatic imbibition, inosculation, and revascularization. Failure can result from:
      • Fluid accumulation (hematoma or seroma)
        • Fluid accumulation beneath the graft can lead to mechanical separation, preventing neovascularization and impairing adherence. Careful wound bed preparation, meticulous intraoperative hemostasis, and wound drainage are essential.
      • Infection 
        • Pathogens usually include Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacterial colonization can compromise graft, leading to graft necrosis. High-risk factors include prior trauma, radiation, or a contaminated wound bed. Antibiotic therapy and debridement may be required for management.
      • Shearing forces, excessive tension, and desiccation 
        • These issues can cause graft dehydration, disrupt graft adherence, and lead to mechanical detachment. Proper immobilization, bolster dressings, and NPWT can mitigate this risk.
      • Poor wound bed vascularity
        • This increases the likelihood of graft loss, as seen in irradiated or previously traumatized tissues.
  • Hypertrophic scarring and contractures 
    • Scar tissue formation may lead to significant functional and cosmetic issues.
      • Joint contractures
        • These can severely limit mobility, particularly when grafts are placed over flexor surfaces. Early mobilization helps but must be carefully balanced to avoid graft damage.
        • Severe contractures may require additional interventions such as Z-plasty or tissue expansion.
  • Pigmentation variability and cosmesis 
    • Split-thickness grafts 
      • This type of graft may be less desirable cosmetically due to its textural differences and lack of adnexal structures (hair, sweat glands, sebaceous glands).[3][13] This graft type may also appear dry and scaly.
    • Full-thickness grafts  
      • This type of graft has better cosmetic outcomes but requires a well-vascularized recipient bed.
      • Pigmentation may be uneven, particularly in darker-skinned individuals, due to melanocyte depletion or mismatch with native tissue.
  • Chronic ulceration and breakdown 
    • Poorly vascularized grafts, particularly in weight-bearing or high-pressure areas (eg, feet, sacrum), are prone to recurrent breakdown.
    • This is more common in patients with vascular insufficiency or diabetes.
  • Graft rejection
    • While rare in autografts, rejection can occur in allografts or composite grafts in a delayed fashion, often due to immune-mediated mechanisms.[20]

Donor Site Complications

  • Delayed healing and infection 
    • Split-thickness donor sites are prone to infection if not managed with appropriate occlusive dressings.
  • Scarring and hypersensitivity 
    • Keloid formation, hyperesthesia, or chronic pain can affect the donor site.
  • Hypopigmentation & cosmetic issues 
    • This is especially problematic in darker-skinned individuals, leading to a noticeable contrast between donor and recipient areas.

Prevention & Optimization

Successful grafting depends on meticulous wound bed preparation, hemostasis, and postoperative protection. Using bolster dressings, NPWT, and careful monitoring for hematoma, seroma, and infection is essential. Early contracture, pigmentation mismatch, or ulceration intervention can improve long-term outcomes. Careful patient selection, especially in those with vascular compromise, prior radiation, or high bacterial loads, is crucial in optimizing graft survival.

Clinical Significance

Skin grafting is a fundamental reconstructive technique used in trauma, burns, chronic wounds, and after oncologic surgery. Grafting is critical in wound closure, infection prevention, and functional restoration. By reestablishing skin continuity, grafting reduces insensible fluid losses, protects against bacterial invasion, and accelerates healing, ultimately improving patient survival and quality of life. Timely debridement and grafting are essential to optimizing outcomes, as delayed intervention increases the risk of infection, graft failure, and poor cosmetic results. Cosmesis is further enhanced with prompt wound treatment, particularly in large defects or facial reconstruction cases.

While skin grafts can be life-saving, their success is influenced by patient-specific factors. Comorbidities such as congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes are associated with higher rates of graft failure due to impaired vascular supply and delayed healing.[27] Other significant risk factors include bacterial contamination, hematoma, seroma formation, and poor wound bed vascularity, all of which can lead to graft necrosis. Patients with extensive injuries or burns who lack sufficient donor skin for autografting may require skin substitutes, which serve as temporary or permanent coverage without viable autologous tissue.

A 20-year review of grafting studies determined that while autologous tissue provides the best long-term results, engineered skin substitutes can be viable alternatives when donor skin is unavailable. Allografts were found to be superior to synthetic, temporary coverage, highlighting their potential as a bridge to definitive reconstruction.[1] Advances in tissue engineering have also led to the development of autologous-engineered matrices, which aim to provide the benefits of autografts while reducing the need for large donor sites. One study comparing autologous skin cell suspension with traditional split-thickness skin grafts demonstrated that this technique allowed for greater surface area coverage with minimal donor site morbidity while achieving similar healing, scarring, and safety outcomes. These findings suggest that newer autologous cell-based therapies may expand treatment options for patients requiring extensive skin replacement.[28]

Despite their limitations, skin grafts remain an essential tool in reconstructive surgery. They offer effective wound coverage, functional restoration, and aesthetic improvement solutions. Advances in grafting techniques and bioengineered alternatives continue to refine outcomes, expanding the clinical applications of this critical procedure.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Effective wound grafting requires a multidisciplinary approach, integrating several clinicians' skills and expertise, including physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals, to optimize patient-centered care. Surgeons and advanced practitioners must develop proficiency in graft selection, surgical techniques, and postoperative management, ensuring optimal healing and minimizing complications. Nurses play a crucial role in wound assessment, dressing changes, infection prevention, and patient education, while pharmacists ensure appropriate antibiotic stewardship, pain management, and adjunctive therapies to support graft survival. Strong interprofessional communication is essential to coordinate care, recognize early signs of complications, and adjust treatment plans accordingly.

Strategic collaboration enhances patient outcomes by streamlining care coordination, reducing errors, and promoting shared decision-making. Clinicians, including physicians and advanced practitioners, must communicate effectively with nurses to monitor wound healing and with physical and occupational therapists to balance early mobilization with graft protection. Pharmacists contribute by advising on medication interactions and pain control strategies, ensuring adherence to best practices. A well-coordinated team approach improves patient safety by reducing infection risks, optimizing wound care protocols, and enhancing the overall quality of care. Interprofessional teams can significantly improve graft success rates and long-term functional outcomes through structured communication and shared clinical goals.

References


[1]

Aleman Paredes K, Selaya Rojas JC, Flores Valdés JR, Castillo JL, Montelongo Quevedo M, Mijangos Delgado FJ, de la Cruz Durán HA, Nolasco Mendoza CL, Nuñez Vazquez EJ. A Comparative Analysis of the Outcomes of Various Graft Types in Burn Reconstruction Over the Past 24 Years: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024 Feb:16(2):e54277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54277. Epub 2024 Feb 15     [PubMed PMID: 38496152]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[2]

Adams DC, Ramsey ML. Grafts in dermatologic surgery: review and update on full- and split-thickness skin grafts, free cartilage grafts, and composite grafts. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2005 Aug:31(8 Pt 2):1055-67     [PubMed PMID: 16042930]


[3]

Borda LJ, Cushman CS, Chu TW. Utilization of Split-Thickness Skin Graft as a Treatment Option Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery. Cureus. 2024 Feb:16(2):e53652. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53652. Epub 2024 Feb 5     [PubMed PMID: 38449936]


[4]

Hazani R, Whitney R, Wilhelmi BJ. Optimizing aesthetic results in skin grafting. The American surgeon. 2012 Feb:78(2):151-4     [PubMed PMID: 22369820]


[5]

Oravcová D, Koller J. Currently available skin substitutes. Casopis lekaru ceskych. 2014:153(1):7-12     [PubMed PMID: 24506687]


[6]

B AP, Vishwanath G, Tikar CR, Deshpande SG. A Study of Cadaveric Skin Graft Harvest and Usage: An Observational Prospective Pilot Study. Cureus. 2024 Sep:16(9):e69932. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69932. Epub 2024 Sep 22     [PubMed PMID: 39439632]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[7]

Sheridan R. Closure of the excised burn wound: autografts, semipermanent skin substitutes, and permanent skin substitutes. Clinics in plastic surgery. 2009 Oct:36(4):643-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2009.05.010. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19793558]


[8]

Leon-Villapalos J, Eldardiri M, Dziewulski P. The use of human deceased donor skin allograft in burn care. Cell and tissue banking. 2010 Feb:11(1):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s10561-009-9152-1. Epub 2010 Jan 15     [PubMed PMID: 20077178]


[9]

Sood R, Roggy D, Zieger M, Balledux J, Chaudhari S, Koumanis DJ, Mir HS, Cohen A, Knipe C, Gabehart K, Coleman JJ. Cultured epithelial autografts for coverage of large burn wounds in eighty-eight patients: the Indiana University experience. Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association. 2010 Jul-Aug:31(4):559-68. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181e4ca29. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20616650]


[10]

Haddad AG, Giatsidis G, Orgill DP, Halvorson EG. Skin Substitutes and Bioscaffolds: Temporary and Permanent Coverage. Clinics in plastic surgery. 2017 Jul:44(3):627-634. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Apr 1     [PubMed PMID: 28576252]


[11]

Metcalfe AD, Ferguson MW. Tissue engineering of replacement skin: the crossroads of biomaterials, wound healing, embryonic development, stem cells and regeneration. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface. 2007 Jun 22:4(14):413-37     [PubMed PMID: 17251138]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[12]

Heimbach DM, Warden GD, Luterman A, Jordan MH, Ozobia N, Ryan CM, Voigt DW, Hickerson WL, Saffle JR, DeClement FA, Sheridan RL, Dimick AR. Multicenter postapproval clinical trial of Integra dermal regeneration template for burn treatment. The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation. 2003 Jan-Feb:24(1):42-8     [PubMed PMID: 12543990]


[13]

Boyce ST, Kagan RJ. Composition and Performance of Autologous Engineered Skin Substitutes for Repair or Regeneration of Excised, Full-Thickness Burns. Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association. 2023 Jan 2:44(Suppl_1):S50-S56. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac107. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35917370]


[14]

Shimizu R, Kishi K. Skin graft. Plastic surgery international. 2012:2012():563493. doi: 10.1155/2012/563493. Epub 2012 Feb 6     [PubMed PMID: 22570780]


[15]

Ameer F, Singh AK, Kumar S. Evolution of instruments for harvest of the skin grafts. Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. 2013 Jan:46(1):28-35. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.113704. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23960303]


[16]

Buller M, Lee TJ, Davis J, Wilhelmi BJ. Bolstering Skin Grafts With a Surgical Scrub Brush: A Cost-effective Solution. Eplasty. 2017:17():e21     [PubMed PMID: 28702109]


[17]

Barrett S. Wound-bed preparation: a vital step in the healing process. British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing). 2017 Jun 22:26(12 Suppl):S24-S31. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.12.S24. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28640728]


[18]

. Speeding up wound healing with debridement. Frequent wound cleaning can yield faster results. The Johns Hopkins medical letter health after 50. 2013 Nov:25(11):6     [PubMed PMID: 24634956]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[19]

Jones CM, Rothermel AT, Mackay DR. Evidence-Based Medicine: Wound Management. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2017 Jul:140(1):201e-216e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003486. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28654620]


[20]

Rose LF, Wu JC, Carlsson AH, Tucker DI, Leung KP, Chan RK. Recipient wound bed characteristics affect scarring and skin graft contraction. Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. 2015 Mar-Apr:23(2):287-96. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12267. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25683192]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[21]

Koljonen V. [Techniques of skin grafting]. Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja. 2011:127(20):2139-47     [PubMed PMID: 22191200]


[22]

Liu HH, Chang CK, Huang CH, Wu JR, Chen CY, Huang DW, Chu TS, Hsu KF, Wang CY, Chiang IH, Ou KL, Wang CH, Dai NT, Chen SG, Tzeng YS. Use of split-thickness plantar skin grafts in the management of leg and foot skin defects. International wound journal. 2018 Oct:15(5):783-788. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12927. Epub 2018 May 24     [PubMed PMID: 29797454]


[23]

Lyons JL, Kagan RJ. The true meshing ratio of skin graft meshers. Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association. 2014 May-Jun:35(3):257-60. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182a3692e. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24126474]


[24]

Capek L, Flynn C, Molitor M, Chong S, Henys P. Graft orientation influences meshing ratio. Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries. 2018 Sep:44(6):1439-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 31     [PubMed PMID: 29861098]


[25]

Nakamura Y, Fujisawa Y, Ishitsuka Y, Tanaka R, Maruyama H, Okiyama N, Watanabe R, Fujimoto M. Negative-pressure closure was superior to tie-over technique for stabilization of split-thickness skin graft in large or muscle-exposing defects: A retrospective study. The Journal of dermatology. 2018 Oct:45(10):1207-1210. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14536. Epub 2018 Jul 16     [PubMed PMID: 30010206]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[26]

Isago T, Nozaki M, Kikuchi Y, Honda T, Nakazawa H. Skin graft fixation with negative-pressure dressings. The Journal of dermatology. 2003 Sep:30(9):673-8     [PubMed PMID: 14578557]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[27]

Gould LJ, Acampora C, Borrelli M. Comparative Analysis of Autologous Skin Cell Suspension Technology and Split-Thickness Skin Grafting for Subacute Wounds in Medically Complex Patients: Propensity-Matched Cohort Study. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2025 Jan 1:240(1):34-45. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001220. Epub 2024 Dec 16     [PubMed PMID: 39431608]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[28]

Henry S, Mapula S, Grevious M, Foster KN, Phelan H, Shupp J, Chan R, Harrington D, Mashruwala N, Brown DA, Mir H, Singer G, Cordova A, Rae L, Chin T, Castanon L, Bell D, Hughes W, Molnar JA. Maximizing wound coverage in full-thickness skin defects: A randomized-controlled trial of autologous skin cell suspension and widely meshed autograft versus standard autografting. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2024 Jan 1:96(1):85-93. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004120. Epub 2023 Sep 1     [PubMed PMID: 38098145]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence