Back To Search Results

Tricuspid Valve Repair

Editor: Andaleeb A. Ahmed Updated: 1/19/2025 5:17:44 PM

Introduction

Tricuspid regurgitation is the most common indication requiring tricuspid valve repair. An estimated 1.6 million people in the United States have moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation, compared to only a few thousand tricuspid valve repair procedures performed annually.[1] According to the United States National Registry, 5005 primary tricuspid valve procedures were performed with in-hospital mortality of 8.8% over 10 years.[2] Due to convincing evidence available now that untreated severe tricuspid regurgitation results in a worsened outcome, there is an increased interest in the treatment of sole tricuspid valve pathologies.[3] Study results have shown that tricuspid regurgitation is associated with a higher incidence of cardiac events and mortality in patients with congestive heart failure.[4]

Repairing the tricuspid valve presents unique challenges compared to mitral valve repair, primarily due to its intricate anatomy. The tricuspid valve has 3 leaflets, a saddle-shaped, dynamic annulus, and a complex subvalvular apparatus, making its repair more demanding. Late referrals for tricuspid valve surgery further complicate treatment and contribute to poorer patient outcomes. Research results indicate moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation is associated with reduced survival rates. As a result, tricuspid valve surgeries are becoming increasingly common to enhance survival and quality of life. Tricuspid valve disorders are generally categorized into congenital and acquired conditions. Repair strategies often extend beyond simple annular reduction techniques to restore the intricate functional interactions among the valve's anatomical components.[5]

Tricuspid regurgitation is frequently observed in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation.[6] Observational studies primarily inform current guidelines for managing tricuspid regurgitation during mitral valve surgery.[7] There is consensus that severe tricuspid regurgitation is unlikely to resolve following left-sided cardiac surgery and should be addressed during the initial procedure, as late reoperations for severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients with right heart failure carry a high risk of perioperative mortality.[8]

The management of milder forms of tricuspid regurgitation remains a subject of debate. Treatments for left-sided cardiac disease often lead to improvements in tricuspid regurgitation, driven by factors such as right ventricular remodeling and reductions in pulmonary artery pressures.[9] However, mild to moderate tricuspid regurgitation left untreated during left-sided cardiac surgery progresses in about 25% of patients, potentially leading to reduced survival and functional outcomes. Risk factors for progression include annular dilation (≥40 mm or ≥21 mm/m²), right ventricular dysfunction, leaflet tethering, pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and transvalvular pacing or defibrillator leads.[10]

Observational studies and results from a small randomized trial with unblinded endpoints suggest that repairing the tricuspid valve in patients with moderate or less-than-moderate regurgitation accompanied by annular dilation may reduce disease progression and improve outcomes.[11] Nonetheless, universal adoption of concomitant tricuspid valve repair faces challenges, including the potential need for permanent pacemaker implantation due to conduction disturbances, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass times, and the rare necessity for tricuspid valve replacement instead of repair. Additionally, not all patients experience progression of tricuspid regurgitation.[12] As a result, there is significant variability in how less-than-severe tricuspid regurgitation is managed during left-sided cardiac surgery. Reported rates of tricuspid valve repair during mitral valve procedures range widely, from 5% to 75%.[13]

Most patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation have traditionally been treated with medical management, as isolated surgical intervention for tricuspid regurgitation has been linked to high rates of periprocedural complications and in-hospital mortality. These poor outcomes are often attributed to late referrals when patients have advanced right-sided heart failure and the high prevalence of prior left-sided heart surgeries among candidates. This has underscored the need for minimally invasive, catheter-based therapeutic options to address tricuspid regurgitation more effectively.

In recent years, several transcatheter devices have been developed for tricuspid valve interventions, with transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) emerging as the most commonly used approach. Among these devices, the TriClip (Abbott) has been the first and most widely adopted for T-TEER.[14] However, evidence supporting its safety and effectiveness primarily derives from the results of retrospective studies that include real-world, unselected patient populations or data collected in highly selected cohorts through prospective trials, such as the TRILUMINATE randomized study.[15] Transcatheter therapies for the tricuspid regurgitation field are advancing rapidly and moving closer to becoming a standard component of routine clinical care.[16]

Anatomy and Physiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Anatomy and Physiology

Of all the valves in the heart, the tricuspid valve is the largest and most apically placed between the right atrium and the right ventricle. The valve consists of 3 leaflets, namely septal, anterior, and posterior, with a normal valve area of 7 to 9 cm2.[17] The tricuspid valve complex comprises the leaflets, annulus, chordae, papillary muscles, and attached right ventricle segment.[18][19][20] The mean pressure gradient across the tricuspid valve is less than 2 mm Hg, and the peak velocity across the valve is less than 1 m/s due to the large size of the valve and lower pressures on the right side of the heart. There are reported variants of the tricuspid valve with 2 or more than 3 cusps.[21] 

The anterior (or attitudinally anterosuperior) leaflet is the largest of the 3 leaflets with the greatest motion. The septal leaflet is the least mobile and attached to the septum less than 10 mm apically from the septal insertion of the anterior mitral leaflet, a distinguishing feature helpful in diagnosing Ebstein anomaly when it is tethered to the right ventricular wall, giving it an echocardiographic appearance of greater than 10 mm apical attachment and causing atrialization of the right ventricle with severe tricuspid regurgitation. The posterior (or attitudinally inferior) leaflet is the shortest circumferentially. The coaptation point of the leaflets is at or below the level of the annulus. The coaptation length is 5 to 10 mm, allowing more valve area in case of annular dilatation before failure to coapt.[22]

Usually, there are 2 papillary muscles, anterior and posterior, with a third variable septal papillary muscle. The anterior papillary muscle is the largest, and attached chordae support the anterior and posterior leaflets. The moderator band sometimes joins this papillary muscle. The posterior papillary muscle can be bifid or trifid, and the attached chordae support posterior and septal leaflets. The tricuspid annulus is a dynamic and D-shaped structure, with a larger semicircular C-shaped segment correlating with the free wall of the right ventricle and a shorter and straighter segment associated with the septum.

Pathophysiology of Tricuspid Regurgitation 

The 2 main tricuspid regurgitation types are primary and secondary (functional). The most common etiology of tricuspid regurgitation is secondary (functional), and its incidence is approximately 90% among patients with tricuspid regurgitation.[23] Primary tricuspid regurgitation is less common and caused by anatomical involvement of tricuspid valve structures; this condition is usually due to a congenital or acquired etiology affecting leaflets or chordae. In secondary (functional) tricuspid regurgitation, leaflets and chords are normal, and tricuspid regurgitation occurs due to atrial and ventricular dilatation, annular dilation, and chordal tethering. The most common causes of secondary tricuspid regurgitation are left-sided valvular or myocardial pathologies and pulmonary hypertension. 

The following are the causes of tricuspid regurgitation:

  • Primary tricuspid regurgitation 
    • This type can be further divided into 2 categories:
      • Congenital
        • Ebstein anomaly
        • Tricuspid valve hypoplasia, clefts
        • Double orifice valve
      • Acquired
        • Prolapse or flail of tricuspid valve leaflets due to myxomatous degeneration
        • Carcinoid syndrome
        • Tricuspid valve endocarditis
        • Related to a pacemaker and implantable cardiac device
        • Rheumatic disease
        • Traumatic injury to the valve structures (chest trauma or iatrogenic with right-sided intracardiac procedures)
  • Secondary tricuspid regurgitation 
    • Left-sided valvular heart diseases (mitral valve stenosis/regurgitation)
    • Left ventricular dysfunction
    • Primary or secondary pulmonary hypertension
    • Right atrial enlargement (in atrial fibrillation)
    • Right ventricular dysfunction and dilatation (remodeling after right ventricular infarct)
    • Tricuspid annular dilatation [20]

Indications

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend tricuspid valve surgery. The only class 1 indication for tricuspid valve surgery is during left-sided valve procedures. For isolated tricuspid valve surgery, the guidelines recommend intervention for patients with symptoms of right-sided heart failure (class 2a) or asymptomatic individuals with primary tricuspid regurgitation and worsening right ventricular function (class 2b). Consequently, many patients undergo treatment later in the disease course. Evidence supporting early intervention for severe tricuspid regurgitation and optimal timing remains limited. However, the latest guidelines emphasize that treating primary tricuspid regurgitation before significant right ventricular dysfunction or end-organ damage is ideal.[24][25]

Isolated tricuspid valve repair is uncommon, even though tricuspid valve abnormalities can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Most tricuspid valve procedures are performed secondarily with other primary cardiac surgical procedures. The most common indication is to perform tricuspid valve surgery in patients with symptomatic severe primary tricuspid regurgitation.[26][27] The following are the indications for tricuspid valve repair or replacement:

  • Symptomatic severe tricuspid stenosis
  • Severe tricuspid stenosis without symptoms when the patient is undergoing left-sided valve surgery
  • Symptomatic severe primary or secondary tricuspid regurgitation
  • Severe primary or secondary tricuspid regurgitation (symptomatic or asymptomatic) when the patient is undergoing left-sided valve surgery
  • Moderate to severe primary tricuspid regurgitation when the patient is undergoing left-sided valve surgery
  • Asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic primary tricuspid regurgitation with evidence of progressive right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction
  • Mild or moderate progressive functional (secondary) tricuspid regurgitation with a dilated annulus (≥40 mm or ≥21 mm/m²) when the patient is undergoing left-sided valve surgery 
  • Tricuspid valve endocarditis
  • Carcinoid involvement of the tricuspid valve 
  • Congenital malformations (eg, Ebstein anomaly)
  • Traumatic or iatrogenic injuries to the valve when taking biopsies or from pacemaker leads

A murmur associated with tricuspid valve regurgitation is typically high-pitched and holosystolic, best heard at the fourth intercostal space along the parasternal region using a stethoscope. The intensity of the murmur increases during inspiration due to augmented venous return to the right heart and diminishes when standing or during a Valsalva maneuver. The murmur may also radiate to the right lower sternal border, reflecting the regurgitant blood flow through the tricuspid valve. This murmur can be detected during a physical examination or confirmed through echocardiography. Additional signs of tricuspid valve regurgitation may include:

  • A pronounced pulse in the neck or near the liver
  • Fatigue, particularly during exertion
  • Swelling in the abdomen, legs, or neck veins

A recent review explored the effectiveness of an algorithm for determining the severity of tricuspid regurgitation. The results showed that severe tricuspid regurgitation was identified based on a suggestive color Doppler jet and the presence of 1 or more of the following criteria:

  • Inferior vena cava diameter greater than 2.5 cm and right atrial area exceeding 18 cm², in the absence of atrial septal defect or pulmonic valve disease
  • Jet area larger than 10 cm² and vena contracta width exceeding 7 mm
  • Systolic flow reversal in the hepatic veins, provided there is no atrioventricular dissociation, ventricular pacing, or atrial arrhythmia
  • A triangular continuous wave Doppler signal with a density comparable to or greater than tricuspid inflow

These parameters strongly correlate with expert interpretations and magnetic resonance imaging-measured regurgitant volume and fraction (>48% for severe tricuspid regurgitation). Additionally, they improved consistency among observers.[28]

Technique or Treatment

Surgical Repair of the Tricuspid Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation is the most common reason for patients undergoing surgical tricuspid valve repair. Further, those with secondary (functional) tricuspid regurgitation most likely undergo repair. In contrast, patients with primary tricuspid regurgitation are not considered suitable for repair due to pathology involving multiple leaflets, and replacement results are better. Tricuspid valve repair reduces the annular diameter and right ventricular afterload but increases valvular coaptation. Important anatomic considerations for the surgeon include the presence of the atrioventricular node and conducting system within the triangle of Koch demarcated as the base of the Todaro septal leaflet, coronary sinus orifice, and tendon. The tricuspid annulus is also related to the base of the aortic valve, the membranous interventricular septum, the right coronary artery, the fibrous body, and the lateral atrioventricular junction. The following are various techniques for the tricuspid valve repair: 

  • Suture annuloplasty 
    • Kay described the first suture annuloplasty technique to treat secondary tricuspid regurgitation. In this technique, sutures are placed to completely exclude the posterior tricuspid leaflet and convert the valve into a bicuspid valve.[29] 
    • Another technique introduced by De Vega is suture annuloplasty, in which 2 parallel sutures are placed in a counterclockwise fashion, starting from posteroseptal commissure to anteroseptal commissure, around the tricuspid valve annulus and tied together, reducing annular diameter.[30] However, the problem with this technique is that sutures can cut through the myocardium— especially if it is fragile.
  • Ring annuloplasty 
    • Carpentier introduced the technique of using a rigid or semi-rigid ring to reinforce and fixate the tricuspid annulus in systole to restore the physiological geometry of the tricuspid valve. The size of the ring is typically decided by measuring the distance from the anteroseptal commissure to the posteroseptal commissure.[31] The proximity of the conduction system and the aortic root requires careful suture placement during the procedure. 
    • A retrospective study published in 2004 by McCarthy et al examined 790 patients treated at the Cleveland clinic. The research evaluated the durability and risk factors associated with different techniques of tricuspid repair. According to the results, regurgitation remained stable with a rigid ring, increased gradually with a flexible band, and rose quickly over time with DeVega suture annuloplasty and pericardial strip reinforcement procedures. While the indications and techniques for tricuspid repair are still in their infancy, the current data suggest that repair with a rigid, near-complete ring is the best option.[32]
  • Clover technique 
    • Alfieri proposed stitching together the leaflets' middle points (a concept similar to the Alfieri stitch for the mitral valve) and adding ring annuloplasty to decrease the annular diameter of the tricuspid valve. This technique gives the valve a clover shape, known as the clover technique, and has been used in primary and secondary tricuspid regurgitation.[33] 
  • Other surgical techniques
    • Other surgical techniques for tricuspid valve repair are used in primary tricuspid regurgitation and depend on the mechanism and involved pathology. They range from surgical intervention and repair of leaflets when there is a prolapse or flail segment, chordal transposition or neochord when there is chordal rupture, and sliding papillary muscle repair when there is a diseased or elongated papillary muscle.[34] 
    • If the valve is primarily affected by a diseased process and a repair technique is not feasible to correct the pathology, such as carcinoid syndrome or endocarditis, valve replacement should be considered. Usually, a bioprosthetic valve is chosen for the tricuspid position due to decreased pressures, increased thrombotic risk, and future chances of pacemaker lead placement.
  • Transcatheter repair 
    • Though it has been shown that untreated tricuspid regurgitation has adverse outcomes, most of the patients with sole tricuspid pathology still receive conservative treatment due to the high risk involved with the surgery. For this reason and because of the success of treating other valve problems, the percutaneous transcatheter tricuspid repair is gaining attention. Many innovative technologies are under investigation for transcatheter tricuspid valve repair targeting leaflet coaptation, annuloplasty, and prosthetic valve deployment. Currently, the most widely used technique is the off-label use of the edge-to-edge clip repair system.[35] Current surgical tricuspid annuloplasty consists of ring and suture techniques. Of suture techniques, the surgical plication of the posterior leaflet, making the valve functionally bicuspid, and the suturing of the 3 leaflets edge to edge are the most common techniques to treat severe tricuspid regurgitation. T-TEER can produce results similar to those of these suture techniques. Reports of the first cases of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair were published in 2016 in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation and a high surgical risk of complications.[36] Intraprocedural guidance to direct the clip at the desired leaflets is a challenge in this technique due to the anteriorly located tricuspid valve and 3 leaflets.[15]
    • Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography is required to place the clips successfully. The other challenge is the steering of the clip system, as it is not designed to be used for the tricuspid valve. Percutaneous transcatheter tricuspid repair techniques can be broadly divided into the following categories:
      • Direct suture annuloplasty 
      • Direct ring annuloplasty
      • Coaptation enhancement
    • The inferior vena cava is very close to the tricuspid valve and septum, making it challenging to steer the system perpendicular to the valve for clip deployment.[37] The main aim is to deploy the clips to reduce the valve's effective regurgitation orifice area (EROA). Usually, deploying the valve on septal and anterior leaflets gives the best results.[38] Other techniques are deploying 2 clips on the septal anterior and septal posterior leaflets and a zipping technique, where 2 clips are deployed to the anteroseptal commissure, making the valve bicuspid. This technique is being used in patients considered high risk for surgery. Though there are no set criteria available so far to exclude patients for this procedure, patients with concurrent tricuspid stenosis, EROA more than 1.5 cm2, coaptation defect more than 15 mm, and restricted leaflet mobility due to hardware like implanted leads, are considered not suitable for transcatheter repair.[39]
    • There are transcatheter annuloplasty devices under investigation for treating functional tricuspid regurgitation, where transcatheter direct annuloplasty can be performed by anchoring a ring whose size can be controlled according to the desired diameter.[40] In some cases, due to annular dilatation and leaflet involvement, a combined approach using a coaptation device along with an annuloplasty device is warranted for better results.[41]

Complications

The complications involved with tricuspid valve repair, whether surgical or transcutaneous, are generalized to any valvular procedure of the heart. The following complications can occur after tricuspid valve repair:

  • Perioperative bleeding and resulting blood product transfusion-related complications
  • Arrhythmias and heart blocks
  • Heart failure
  • Stroke
  • Infections of the surgical site and/or the valve prosthesis
  • Sepsis
  • Pulmonary complications, eg, pneumonia, embolisms 
  • Renal failure (higher risk in transcatheter procedures with pre-existing renal disease due to dye use)
  • Drug reactions
  • Prosthetic valve malfunction [25]

The tricuspid valve has been considered a "forgotten" valve due to hesitation in treating sole tricuspid lesions in the past. Surgical mortality for tricuspid valve replacement is 3 to 4 times higher compared to other single-valve open procedures. Severe tricuspid regurgitation is associated with a poor prognosis independent of age, biventricular function, and right ventricular size. Most tricuspid valve repair procedures are performed with the left-sided cardiac procedure.

The current gold standard for surgical repair is ring annuloplasty with an incomplete semirigid annuloplasty ring. Still, some centers perform modified bicuspidisation when the annulus is not severely dilated. As only a tiny fraction of patients are considered surgical candidates, there has been a renewed interest in developing percutaneous transcatheter devices for tricuspid regurgitation. Percutaneous techniques will likely increase due to improved technology and increased awareness of tricuspid regurgitation's effects on long-term outcomes.

Clinical Significance

Tricuspid valve repair as a sole procedure is relatively uncommon. Historically, tricuspid valve incompetence has not been considered significant to affect the outcome, a concept which is questioned in recent studies, showing untreated tricuspid regurgitation, particularly in the presence of other cardiac diseases, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.[42] Moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation should not be ignored, as it eventually affects the quality of life and survival. With more options available for tricuspid valve repair, surgical valvuloplasty, and percutaneous repair, any significant degree of tricuspid regurgitation should be addressed.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Effective tricuspid valve repair management requires clinical skills, strategic planning, interprofessional communication, and care coordination. Clinicians must develop procedural expertise in surgical or catheter-based repair techniques while accurately assessing patient suitability for intervention. Nurses play a vital role in perioperative care, including monitoring for complications, managing wound care, and educating patients about postoperative recovery. To improve patient safety and outcomes, pharmacists ensure optimal medication management, including anticoagulation and heart failure therapies. Each team member must apply evidence-based practices to support comprehensive, patient-centered care.

Interprofessional communication is crucial to synchronizing efforts among healthcare professionals. Regular case discussions, preoperative planning meetings, and post-procedure debriefings enhance team performance and facilitate the timely identification of potential complications. Care coordination ensures a seamless transition across care settings, from initial evaluation to postoperative follow-up. Collaborative strategies—such as creating individualized care plans, employing standardized protocols, and leveraging electronic health records for shared documentation—help optimize outcomes, reduce errors, and promote a culture of safety. This integrated approach ensures that all professionals contribute effectively to improving patient-centered outcomes in tricuspid valve repair.

References


[1]

Vassileva CM, Shabosky J, Boley T, Markwell S, Hazelrigg S. Tricuspid valve surgery: the past 10 years from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2012 May:143(5):1043-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 26     [PubMed PMID: 21872283]


[2]

Zack CJ, Fender EA, Chandrashekar P, Reddy YNV, Bennett CE, Stulak JM, Miller VM, Nishimura RA. National Trends and Outcomes in Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017 Dec 19:70(24):2953-2960. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.039. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29241483]


[3]

Taramasso M, Vanermen H, Maisano F, Guidotti A, La Canna G, Alfieri O. The growing clinical importance of secondary tricuspid regurgitation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012 Feb 21:59(8):703-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.069. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22340261]


[4]

Agricola E, Stella S, Gullace M, Ingallina G, D'Amato R, Slavich M, Oppizzi M, Ancona MB, Margonato A. Impact of functional tricuspid regurgitation on heart failure and death in patients with functional mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction. European journal of heart failure. 2012 Aug:14(8):902-8. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs063. Epub 2012 May 2     [PubMed PMID: 22552182]


[5]

Saran N, Dearani JA. Strategies for tricuspid valve repair. Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2020 Jan:36(Suppl 1):123-130. doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00826-x. Epub 2019 May 22     [PubMed PMID: 33061193]


[6]

Essayagh B, Antoine C, Benfari G, Maalouf J, Michelena HI, Crestanello JA, Thapa P, Avierinos JF, Enriquez-Sarano M. Functional tricuspid regurgitation of degenerative mitral valve disease: a crucial determinant of survival. European heart journal. 2020 May 21:41(20):1918-1929. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa192. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32300779]


[7]

Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, Capodanno D, Conradi L, De Bonis M, De Paulis R, Delgado V, Freemantle N, Gilard M, Haugaa KH, Jeppsson A, Jüni P, Pierard L, Prendergast BD, Sádaba JR, Tribouilloy C, Wojakowski W, ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2021 Oct 22:60(4):727-800. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab389. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 34453161]


[8]

Jeganathan R, Armstrong S, Al-Alao B, David T. The risk and outcomes of reoperative tricuspid valve surgery. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2013 Jan:95(1):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.058. Epub 2012 Oct 25     [PubMed PMID: 23103002]


[9]

Sordelli C, Lancellotti P, Carlomagno G, Di Giannuario G, Alati E, De Bonis M, Alfieri O, La Canna G. Tricuspid Annular Size and Regurgitation Progression After Surgical Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation. The American journal of cardiology. 2016 Aug 1:118(3):424-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.014. Epub 2016 May 14     [PubMed PMID: 27287061]


[10]

McCarthy PM, Szlapka M, Kruse J, Kislitsina ON, Thomas JD, Liu M, Andrei AC, Cox JL. The relationship of atrial fibrillation and tricuspid annular dilation to late tricuspid regurgitation in patients with degenerative mitral repair. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2021 Jun:161(6):2030-2040.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.098. Epub 2019 Dec 12     [PubMed PMID: 31952828]


[11]

Brescia AA, Ward ST, Watt TMF, Rosenbloom LM, Baker M, Khan S, Ziese E, Romano MA, Bolling SF, Michigan Mitral Research Group (MMRG). Outcomes of Guideline-Directed Concomitant Annuloplasty for Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2020 Apr:109(4):1227-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.035. Epub 2019 Aug 31     [PubMed PMID: 31479635]


[12]

Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A, Toly C. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021 Feb 2:143(5):e35-e71. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932. Epub 2020 Dec 17     [PubMed PMID: 33332149]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[13]

Dion RA. Is the air in Toronto, Rochester, and Cleveland different from that in London, Monaco, Leiden, Genk, Milan, and New York? The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2015 Nov:150(5):1040-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.048. Epub 2015 Aug 20     [PubMed PMID: 26410006]


[14]

Mesnier J, Alperi A, Panagides V, Bédard E, Salaun E, Philippon F, Rodés-Cabau J. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions: Current devices and associated evidence. Progress in cardiovascular diseases. 2021 Nov-Dec:69():89-100. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Nov 19     [PubMed PMID: 34801577]


[15]

Sorajja P, Whisenant B, Hamid N, Naik H, Makkar R, Tadros P, Price MJ, Singh G, Fam N, Kar S, Schwartz JG, Mehta S, Bae R, Sekaran N, Warner T, Makar M, Zorn G, Spinner EM, Trusty PM, Benza R, Jorde U, McCarthy P, Thourani V, Tang GHL, Hahn RT, Adams DH, TRILUMINATE Pivotal Investigators. Transcatheter Repair for Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation. The New England journal of medicine. 2023 May 18:388(20):1833-1842. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300525. Epub 2023 Mar 4     [PubMed PMID: 36876753]


[16]

Rodés-Cabau J, Januzzi JL Jr, Mack MJ. Tricuspid Transcatheter Repair: Edging Toward Prime Time? Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023 Jul 25:82(4):292-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.028. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 37468184]


[17]

Dahou A, Levin D, Reisman M, Hahn RT. Anatomy and Physiology of the Tricuspid Valve. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 2019 Mar:12(3):458-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.032. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30846121]


[18]

Martinez RM, O'Leary PW, Anderson RH. Anatomy and echocardiography of the normal and abnormal tricuspid valve. Cardiology in the young. 2006 Sep:16 Suppl 3():4-11     [PubMed PMID: 17378035]


[19]

Antunes MJ, Barlow JB. Management of tricuspid valve regurgitation. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2007 Feb:93(2):271-6     [PubMed PMID: 17228081]


[20]

Putthapiban P, Amini MR, Abudayyeh I. Anatomy of the Tricuspid Valve and Pathophysiology of Tricuspid Regurgitation. Interventional cardiology clinics. 2022 Jan:11(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2021.09.003. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 34838292]


[21]

Xanthos T, Dalivigkas I, Ekmektzoglou KA. Anatomic variations of the cardiac valves and papillary muscles of the right heart. Italian journal of anatomy and embryology = Archivio italiano di anatomia ed embriologia. 2011:116(2):111-26     [PubMed PMID: 22303639]


[22]

Silver MD, Lam JH, Ranganathan N, Wigle ED. Morphology of the human tricuspid valve. Circulation. 1971 Mar:43(3):333-48     [PubMed PMID: 5544987]


[23]

Mutlak D, Lessick J, Reisner SA, Aronson D, Dabbah S, Agmon Y. Echocardiography-based spectrum of severe tricuspid regurgitation: the frequency of apparently idiopathic tricuspid regurgitation. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2007 Apr:20(4):405-8     [PubMed PMID: 17400120]


[24]

Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A, Toly C. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021 Feb 2:143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17     [PubMed PMID: 33332150]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[25]

Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, Capodanno D, Conradi L, De Bonis M, De Paulis R, Delgado V, Freemantle N, Gilard M, Haugaa KH, Jeppsson A, Jüni P, Pierard L, Prendergast BD, Sádaba JR, Tribouilloy C, Wojakowski W, ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: Developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Revista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.). 2022 Jun:75(6):524. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.05.006. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35636831]


[26]

Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA, O'Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM 3rd, Thomas JD, Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Creager MA, Curtis LH, DeMets D, Guyton RA, Hochman JS, Kovacs RJ, Ohman EM, Pressler SJ, Sellke FW, Shen WK, Stevenson WG, Yancy CW, American College of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, American Heart Association. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2014 Jul:148(1):e1-e132. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 May 9     [PubMed PMID: 24939033]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[27]

Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Muñoz D, Rosenhek R, Sjögren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. European heart journal. 2017 Sep 21:38(36):2739-2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28886619]


[28]

Davidson LJ, Tang GHL, Ho EC, Fudim M, Frisoli T, Camaj A, Bowers MT, Masri SC, Atluri P, Chikwe J, Mason PJ, Kovacic JC, Dangas GD, American Heart Association Interventional Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024 May 28:149(22):e1223-e1238. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001232. Epub 2024 Apr 25     [PubMed PMID: 38660790]


[29]

KAY JH, MASELLI-CAMPAGNA G, TSUJI KK. SURGICAL TREATMENT OF TRICUSPID INSUFFICIENCY. Annals of surgery. 1965 Jul:162(1):53-8     [PubMed PMID: 14313519]


[30]

De Vega NG. [Selective, adjustable and permanent annuloplasty. An original technic for the treatment of tricuspid insufficiency]. Revista espanola de cardiologia. 1972 Nov-Dec:25(6):555-6     [PubMed PMID: 4658611]


[31]

Carpentier A, Deloche A, Dauptain J, Soyer R, Blondeau P, Piwnica A, Dubost C, McGoon DC. A new reconstructive operation for correction of mitral and tricuspid insufficiency. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 1971 Jan:61(1):1-13     [PubMed PMID: 5540460]


[32]

McCarthy PM, Bhudia SK, Rajeswaran J, Hoercher KJ, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Blackstone EH. Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2004 Mar:127(3):674-85     [PubMed PMID: 15001895]


[33]

Lapenna E, De Bonis M, Verzini A, La Canna G, Ferrara D, Calabrese MC, Taramasso M, Alfieri O. The clover technique for the treatment of complex tricuspid valve insufficiency: midterm clinical and echocardiographic results in 66 patients. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2010 Jun:37(6):1297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.12.020. Epub 2010 Feb 1     [PubMed PMID: 20117940]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[34]

Belluschi I, Del Forno B, Lapenna E, Nisi T, Iaci G, Ferrara D, Castiglioni A, Alfieri O, De Bonis M. Surgical Techniques for Tricuspid Valve Disease. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine. 2018:5():118. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00118. Epub 2018 Aug 28     [PubMed PMID: 30234129]


[35]

Maisano F, Lorusso R, Sandrelli L, Torracca L, Coletti G, La Canna G, Alfieri O. Valve repair for traumatic tricuspid regurgitation. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 1996:10(10):867-73     [PubMed PMID: 8911840]


[36]

Braun D, Nabauer M, Massberg S, Hausleiter J. Transcatheter Repair of Primary Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation Using the MitraClip System. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2016 Aug 8:9(15):e153-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.05.020. Epub 2016 Jul 13     [PubMed PMID: 27423227]


[37]

Braun D, Nabauer M, Orban M, Orban M, Gross L, Englmaier A, Rösler D, Mehilli J, Bauer A, Hagl C, Massberg S, Hausleiter J. Transcatheter treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation using the edge-to-edge repair technique. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2017 Feb 3:12(15):e1837-e1844. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00949. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28089953]


[38]

Vismara R, Gelpi G, Prabhu S, Romitelli P, Troxler LG, Mangini A, Romagnoni C, Contino M, Van Hoven DT, Lucherini F, Jaworek M, Redaelli A, Fiore GB, Antona C. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Treatment of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation in an Ex Vivo Pulsatile Heart Model. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2016 Sep 6:68(10):1024-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.022. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27585507]


[39]

Besler C, Orban M, Rommel KP, Braun D, Patel M, Hagl C, Borger M, Nabauer M, Massberg S, Thiele H, Hausleiter J, Lurz P. Predictors of Procedural and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Symptomatic Tricuspid Regurgitation Undergoing Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2018 Jun 25:11(12):1119-1128. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.05.002. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29929631]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[40]

Mangieri A, Latib A. Transcatheter innovations in tricuspid regurgitation: Cardioband. Progress in cardiovascular diseases. 2019 Nov-Dec:62(6):482-485. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 25     [PubMed PMID: 31669500]


[41]

Tabata N, Weber M, Tsujita K, Sinning JM, Nickenig G. Combined Percutaneous Therapy for Tricuspid Regurgitation Using the Cardioband and PASCAL System in 1 Procedure. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2019 Nov 25:12(22):e197-e198. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.031. Epub 2019 Oct 30     [PubMed PMID: 31678088]


[42]

Kim HK, Lee SP, Kim YJ, Sohn DW. Tricuspid regurgitation: clinical importance and its optimal surgical timing. Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound. 2013 Mar:21(1):1-9. doi: 10.4250/jcu.2013.21.1.1. Epub 2013 Mar 20     [PubMed PMID: 23560135]